This content was archived on June 24, 2013.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
Health Canada
2010
ISBN: 978-1-100-16142-6 (PDF Version)
Cat. No.: H1-9/3-2-2010E (PDF Version)
HC Pub.: 110012 (PDF Version)
Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
The Privacy Act (the Act) gives individuals the right of access to information about themselves held by the federal government with certain specific and limited exceptions. The Act protects an individual's privacy by setting out provisions related to the collection, retention, use and disclosure of personal information.
The Privacy Act requires (in section 72) the head of every federal government institution to submit an annual report to Parliament on the administration of the Act following the close of each fiscal year. This report describes how Health Canada fulfilled its privacy responsibilities during the fiscal year 2009-2010.
Health Canada was established to help the people of Canada maintain and improve their health. Health Canada is also committed to improving the lives of all Canadians and making this country's population among the healthiest in the world as measured by longevity, lifestyle and effective use of the public health care system.
Health Canada develops, implements and enforces regulations, legislation, policies, programs, services and initiatives and works with other federal partners, the provinces and territories. As administrator of the Canada Health Act, Health Canada ensures that the principles of Canada's universal health care are respected, allowing Canadians to be confident in the services they receive from the public health care system. The Minister of Health is also responsible for direct administration of another 18 statutes including the Food and Drugs Act, the Pest Control Products Act and the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act. Health Canada also provides health services to First Nations peoples and to Inuit communities.
Health Canada has regional offices in British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, Atlantic and Northern Region.
For more information about Health Canada, please visit our website at www.health.gc.ca
In January 2009, Health Canada launched "Improving Together", an initiative aimed at transforming the way we work as a department to build a more collaborative organization. Each of the nine initiatives that comprise Improving Together is directly linked to a departmental activity: Science; Policy; Internal Services; Regulatory activities; Communications and consultation; New partnership models for First Nations and Inuit; Regional activities; Compliance and enforcement; Grants and contributions.
Even though these initiatives do not specifically address the administration of the Privacy Act, the efficiencies that will result in the areas of consolidation, collaboration, coordination, work organization, and the strengthening of the procedures for the development of Memoranda to Cabinet are expected to support a stronger Departmental privacy regime.
The Access to Information and Privacy (ATIP) Division within the Planning, Integration and Management Services Directorate, Corporate Services Branch is responsible for administering the Privacy Act, as well as associated Treasury Board Policies and Directives for Health Canada.
The responsibilities of the ATIP Division include:
The Delegation Order is attached as Appendix A.
Health Canada's statistical report summarizing Privacy Act activity is attached as Appendix B and covers the period between April 1, 2009 and March 31, 2010.
Number of Access Requests
Health Canada received 471 new privacy requests during 2009-2010, and carried over 89 requests from the previous year. This represents a reduction of approximately 20% in the number of requests received compared to the previous fiscal year (592 new requests in 2008-2009).
Case Load
The total caseload of 598 requests marked a 11% reduction in the number of requests requiring processing compared to fiscal year 2008-2009, but the complexity factor remained the same, due the sensitivity of the information requested which includes medical records and labour relations documents. Thanks to the reduction in the caseload, Health Canada was able to reduce its number of carried forward requests from 127 to 89 for attention in 2010-2011.
Completed requests were classified as follows:
All disclosed - Of the 509 completed requests; the requesters received full disclosure of relevant records in 199 instances (39.1%).
Disclosed in part - In 135 cases (26.5%), requesters received partial disclosure of relevant records.
Nothing disclosed (excluded) - In 2 instances (0.4%) the applicant received no information because the record was excluded under the Act.
Nothing disclosed (exempt) - No request fell under this category for the reporting period.
Unable to process - Health Canada received 123 requests (24.2%) for which there were no records.
Abandoned - Applicants abandoned 50 requests (9.8%).
Transferred - No request fell under this category for the reporting period.
This section categorizes the exemptions invoked to refuse disclosure by section(s) of the Act. Note that these numbers should not be added because the same information can be denied under more than one exemption. For example, if five different exemptions were cited to deny one request, the reported total would be five.
The most frequently cited exemptions are:
The Privacy Act does not apply to personal information that is available to the public (section 69). Nor does it apply to confidences of the Queen's Privy Council, with some exceptions (section 70). Requests containing proposed exclusions under section 70 require consultation with the Privy Council Office.
Health Canada did not exclude any information under either section 69 or 70.
Health Canada was able to respond within 30 days or less in 239 (47 percent) of completed cases. The remaining requests were completed within 31 to 60 days in 140 (28 percent) cases, 61 to 120 days in 92 (18 percent) cases and 121 or more days in 38 (7 percent) cases.
Legal extensions were invoked in 151 cases (30 percent).
There was only one request for the translation (from English to French) of the personal information kept in Health Canada's records.
'Methods of Access' refers to the method that applicants have chosen to access their records. Applicants can choose to receive copies of their records or to examine the records at a Health Canada facility.
These statistics are based only on the requests where Health Canada was able to identify and process the records for the individual - in the cases where no records could be were disclosed, no method of access has been identified.
Copies of the original records was the preferred method of access in all cases (334).
There were no requests for the correction or the notation of personal notation during the reporting period.
The ATIP Division spent a total of $502,517.30 on the processing of Privacy Act requests. Of this total: salaries accounted for $319,859.50 and administration for $182,657.80. Salaries for the fiscal year amounted to 5.02 full time positions in the ATIP Division. These figures exclude the time spent by the employees of the other Health Canada divisions on the processing of personal information requests as well as the time and other resources that were involved in the implementation of the security and other measures throughout the department in order to protect the privacy of our employees, clients and other Canadians.
Health Canada pursues a variety of activities to raise its employees' understanding and awareness of their responsibilities under the Act.
The Department delivers targeted training to those employees in need of a more detailed knowledge of the Act and their obligations; this is done via monthly general introductory training sessions, and via specialized training to respond to clients' particular needs.
More specifically, the privacy training activities included:
In 2009-2010, 20 sessions were delivered directly to 172 Health Canada employees across Branches and Regions.
In addition, Information Management (IM) Awareness sessions, delivered with colleagues in Records Management and Security Management, were used as an introduction to ATIP, attracting 124 additional employees. This approach highlights horizontal linkages between ATIP, Security, and Records Management. Employees who attend these sessions leave more aware of their responsibilities and more able to responsibly handle information at Health Canada.
Beyond traditional classroom training, and to place a greater emphasis on the development of broad-based privacy awareness while maximizing scarce resources, Health Canada is developing a privacy awareness-building strategy, which looks to increase the use of non-classroom approaches.
The Departmental Privacy Committee meets monthly and provides leadership and advice on horizontal privacy issues for the Department. To this end, Committee members provide input into the Departmental privacy awareness-building strategy and determine privacy awareness-building opportunities within their respective Branches.
ATIP staff participated via information kiosks at several Department-wide events, handing out information brochures and responding to questions. As part of the long term privacy awareness-building Communication strategy, ATIP updated its privacy intranet site, and created and promoted a privacy wiki, which includes information on current privacy issues, emerging trends and encourages privacy awareness via quizzes and trivia.
This strategy supplements traditional classroom learning and will continue to raise awareness and foster development of a privacy-sensitive corporate culture.
The ATIP Division and the Departmental Privacy Committee initiated the development of a Departmental Privacy Management Framework that will better structure privacy accountability within the Department to ensure compliance with Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat (TBS) Directives on privacy protection.
There are no such issues to report.
No privacy impact assessments were completed during the reporting period.
Sub-paragraph 8(2)(m)(i) allows for the disclosure of personal information where the head of a government institution is of the opinion that the public interest in the disclosure clearly outweighs any invasion of privacy that could result from the disclosure.
In 2009-2010 there were no disclosures of personal information pursuant to that provision of the Privacy Act.
During 2009-2010, 7 complaints under the Privacy Act were filed with the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada. 0 complaints were received in relation to sections 4 to 8 of the Privacy Act - privacy breaches. The disposition of those complaints was as follows:
There were no applications or appeals submitted to the Federal Court or the Federal Court of Appeal during fiscal year 2009-2010.
There were no recommendations raised by other Agents of Parliament during fiscal year 2009-2010.
Senior management at Health Canada fully supports the development and implementation of a Privacy Management Framework; this will enable a more effective management of privacy within Health Canada and facilitate compliance with TBS Policy and Directives obligations.
In March 2010, the Senior Management Board-Operations endorsed development of the Framework, providing a path forward for privacy. Focusing on improved accountability, the Framework will include clear roles and responsibilities for Branches and ATIP, improved monitoring of personal information, procedures to address privacy breaches, a revised Privacy Impact Assessment process, options for renewed privacy governance, and more targeted awareness building and training for officials responsible for privacy information.