Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
Module 4
Audit Findings
Audit Findings
Audit Summaries
Description of Major Changes
Obstacles
Follow-up of Past Nonconformities
Nonconformities
Areas not Audited
The audit report should include sufficient findings to support the audit conclusions (both positive and negative).
Findings should be put into context and supported by objective evidence.
The principles of fair presentation and positive reporting should be used throughout the report. Therefore, an area/requirement not mentioned is deemed to be an area/requirement not audited.
Reports should not contain opportunities for improvement, including specific advice, instructions or solutions towards the development and implementation of a Quality Management System (QMS).
It is nonetheless important for auditors to report observations and findings. Observations can include situations which appear to be non-conforming but where insufficient audit evidence was collected.
In this context, observations should not be confused with Observations to be listed on a United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Form 483; these would be nonconformities.
The observations in question here are observations of questionable significance that would nonetheless be discussed with management.
Observations should be reported in a factual manner without suggesting that any action is required by the auditee.
Examples: (See Study Guide for further examples)
"There is no direct link between the OEM lot number and the lot number assigned by receiving in the Device History Record. A lookup table of receiving records must be used to trace parts back to the OEM lot number."
"The distribution agreements do not stipulate the frequency at which distributors must send copies of distribution records to the manufacturer. The agreements only mention that it must be done."
"SOP <XX-XXX> requires that operators cut the catheter to a length between 14.961 and 15.157 inches. The design specification is for a length of 15.1 ± .1 inches. The measurement acuity of the rulers provided is 0.05 inches."
Written summaries of the audit of each QMS process or activity audited should be included in the report.
Summaries should be arranged by audit topic or QMS process. There are many ways to do this, such as:
Audit summaries should be written in such a way as to naturally lead to audit findings as their conclusion.
Context
Criteria
Evidence
+ Evaluation
= Finding
Audit summaries should be brief but nonetheless include the following:
The inclusion of clause numbers in the concluding statements can help demonstrate appropriate coverage.
| Process Name | Internal Quality Audits (IQA) |
|---|---|
| Relevant Criteria | ISO 13485:2003 clause 8.2.2 |
| Area Visited | Quality Assurance dept., also Management |
| Key Management Interviewed |
<Name>, Quality Assurance Manager <Name>, Vice President Operations |
| Key Documents/ Information Reviewed |
P-IQA-01 Rev. 2 - Internal Audit Procedure |
|---|---|
| Internal audit programme 2008-2009 | |
| Internal audit report for 2008 | |
| Product/Components Reviewed |
Not applicable (N/A) |
Description/ Findings
Internal audit objectives are set annually by the Vice President Operations <Name> based on business and quality objectives. Responsibility for developing and implementing the audit programme rests with the Quality Assurance Manager.
An audit programme was developed for 2008-2009 which included objectives related to review of progress on waste-cutting measures and implementation of new electronic records system.
The 2008 audit was performed Oct. 6-9 by <Name> who works in receiving and is suitably trained (ISO 9001 course (BBI), 13485:2003 course by MedFor Academy, C-MED consultants MDR training) to perform internal audits.
The audit report was reviewed and met the programme objectives as well as requirements of 13485. Findings were well articulated and supported by objective evidence.
The report was formally presented to the Chief Executive Officer and Vice President Operations during the last Strategic Review and Planning (management review) October 27th.
All nonconformities issued during the IQA were entered into CapTrack for timely resolution (5 of 7 closed at date of this audit).
The internal audit process appears to be robust and to be well-tailored to the company's business and quality objectives. The output of this process is judged to be reliable.
Conclusion: The IQA is in full conformity with the requirements of 13485.
When the activity or process being audited has been subject to any change that is likely to affect product conformity with specified requirements or the ability of the QMS to conform or to meet quality objectives, this should be described in the audit report.
The description can be included in an audit summary or under its own heading or section.
This includes major changes to products or processes, changes to the organizational structure or ownership, as well as changes to key personnel and facilities and to the QMS as a whole.
Any description of major changes should include a discussion of the relevance of the changes to regulatory submissions (where appropriate).
Examples:
"<Company> has recently updated the software of the device from version 83.6 to 84. The changes were made to address internal coding standards and nomenclature inconsistencies. As part of design review, the Engineering department concluded that this change did not affect the form or function of the device and therefore did not require a notification to any regulatory agency."
"<Company> has undertaken a design change project to its balloon dilatation catheter <Model Number>. The company is in the process of validating new packaging and qualifying a new contract sterilizer for the devices. Company officials have stated that no licence amendment is planned for this device. A nonconformity was issued (see NC-01) as this is a significant change to a class IV medical device and requires a medical device licence amendment."
See Study Guide for further examples.
The report should identify any obstacles encountered that have the potential to impact the validity of the audit conclusions.
Examples of obstacles include:
Other situations that could impact the validity of the audit conclusions include:
The report should mention any verification of correction or corrective action stemming from past nonconformities. If the nonconformities cannot be closed, this should be indicated.
This item can be included in the audit summaries or under a separate heading.
For each nonconformity issued during the audit, the report shall include the following:
Registrars are free to use additional reporting methods for nonconformities (for example NCR forms, etc.)
The nonconformities and their discussion should be included in the audit summaries in order to provide context for the findings.
Since nonconformities constitute an important class of audit findings, audit reports should provide adequate supporting evidence in relation to these.
Any unresolved objections from the auditee with respect to the issued nonconformities should be recorded in the audit report.
Although auditees may undertake correction and corrective action to discharge nonconformities prior to the closing of the audit, all issued nonconformities need to be reported.