Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
Health Products and Food Branch
Marketed Health Products Directorate
Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter Editorial Team
In this Issue:
Atypical antipsychotics and agranulocytosis
Adverse reaction and incident reporting - 2008
Announcement: Cough and cold products
Case presentation: 5-Hour Energy drink and a cardiovascular adverse reaction
Adverse reaction reporting form
Summary of advisories
Scope
This quarterly publication alerts health professionals to potential signals detected through the
review of case reports submitted to Health Canada. It is a useful mechanism to stimulate adverse
reaction reporting, as well as to disseminate information on suspected adverse reactions to health
products occurring in humans before comprehensive risk-benefit evaluations and regulatory
decisions are undertaken. The continuous evaluation of health product safety profiles depends on
the quality of your reports.
Reporting Adverse Reactions
Canada Vigilance Program
Phone: 1-866-234-2345
Fax: 1-866-678-6789
For more information on how to report an adverse reaction, visit the Reporting Adverse Reactions to Drugs and Other Health Products page.
Caveat: Adverse reactions (ARs) to health products are considered to be suspicions, as a definite causal association often cannot be determined. Spontaneous reports of ARs cannot be used to estimate the incidence of ARs because ARs remain underreported and patient exposure is unknown.
Atypical antipsychotic medications are indicated for the management of symptoms of schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders. Clozapine was the first atypical antipsychotic drug and was marketed in Canada in 1991. Since then, 4 others have been marketed: olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone.1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Granulocytopenia and agranulocytosis have been shown to occur in association with clozapine; therefore, use of this drug requires regular white blood cell and differential counts.1 No cases of drug-induced agranulocytosis were reported during the premarketing clinical trials for olanzapine, quetiapine, risperidone and ziprasidone. 2, 3, 4, 5 However, recent evidence suggests that these drugs may also be associated with an occurrence of agranulocytosis, but not to the extent of clozapine. 6, 7, 8, 9
Agranulocytosis is a life-threatening condition owing to an increased vulnerability to infection and requires immediate medical attention.10 According to the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS),10 the term granulocytopenia is used when granulocyte counts are less than 1.5 x 109/L and no distinctions can be made between eosinophilic and basophilic cells from neutrophilic granulocytes. Neutropenia is defined as an absolute neutrophil count of less than 1.5 x 109/L, and severe neutropenia as a count of less than 0.5 x 109/L. Agranulocytosis is defined as a disorder in which severe neutropenia is associated with the sudden onset of signs and symptoms of bacterial infection, such as sore throat, fever, malaise, prostration and typical presentation with oropharyngeal or anorectal lesions.
Agranulocytosis is an idiosyncratic adverse reaction (AR) resulting from the failure of production of neutrophils in the bone marrow, from their peripheral destruction, or both. Even though the pathogenesis of drug-induced agranulocytosis is not completely understood, studies have suggested that it is mediated by immunoallergic or toxic mechanisms.8
As of Nov. 30, 2008, Health Canada received 69 reports of granulocytopenia, neutropenia and agranulocytosis suspected of being associated with the use of olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone (Table 1). No reports were identified about ziprasidone, which was marketed in January 2008. According to the CIOMS definitions, there were 14 cases of agranulocytosis, 6 cases of severe neutropenia, 45 cases of neutropenia and 4 cases of granulocytopenia. Concomitant medical conditions (e.g., cancer, lupus, Tourette syndrome, depression and cardiovascular disease) or concomitant use of other medications (e.g., typical and atypical antipsychotics, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, anti-inflammatory and antineoplastic drugs), or both, was reported in many of these cases.
Variable |
Olanzapine |
Risperidone |
Quetiapine |
Ziprasidone |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Date marketed (notified) in Canada | November 1996 | September 1999 | January 2001 | January 2008 |
| Approved indications | • Schizophrenia and related disorders • Bipolar disorders |
•Schizophrenia • Severe dementia • Bipolar disorders |
• Schizophrenia • Bipolar disorders |
• Schizophrenia and related disorders • Bipolar disorders |
| Adverse reaction (AR) reports† ‡ | Granulocytopenia: 2 Total: 20 |
Granulocytopenia: 2 Total: 24 |
Neutropenia: 16 Total: 25 |
No reports |
| No. of female/male patients | 8/12 | 9/14§ | 15/8¶ | NA |
| Age of patients, yr | 15-79 | 9-85 | 14-81 | NA |
Health care professionals should be aware of the risk of agranulocytosis suspected of being associated with atypical antipsychotics. Increased awareness leading to early detection and treatment is key to managing this life-threatening AR. Patients should be informed about the importance of symptoms such as fever, sore throat or other infections, and be advised to see their doctor immediately if these symptoms occur.8 Health care professionals are encouraged to report any ARs suspected of being associated with the use of atypical antipsychotics to Health Canada.
Marc Poitras, MSc, PhD, MBA, Health Canada
References
PubMed]
PubMed]
PubMed]
PubMed]Canada Vigilance Program
The Canada Vigilance Program collects reports of suspected adverse reactions (ARs) to health products (pharmaceuticals, biologics, natural health products, radiopharmaceuticals and biotechnology products). This new AR monitoring program and database was implemented within Health Canada in March 2008 and allows for more sophisticated breakdown of data and reports. Further information about the program and its database can be found on the Health Canada web site.
In 2008, Health Canada received 20 360 domestic AR reports (Table 1), of which 69.2% were considered to be serious.* Domestic AR cases received by product type are provided in Table 2.
In Canada, Market Authorization Holders (MAHs) are required to submit AR reports received in accordance with the requirements of the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations. MAHs are required to send, within 15 days, all reports of serious ARs that have occurred in Canada (domestic) and all reports of serious unexpected ARs that have occurred outside Canada (foreign) to the Canada Vigilance Program. In 2008, MAHs submitted 71.8% of all the domestic reports received. The remaining reports were received directly from the community and hospitals (Table 1).
*In the Food and Drugs Act and Regulations, a serious AR is defined as "a noxious and unintended response to a drug that occurs at any dose and that requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, causes congenital malformation, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is life-threatening or results in death."
A serious unexpected AR is defined as "a serious adverse drug reaction that is not identified in nature, severity or frequency in the risk information set out on the label of the drug."
The number of domestic AR reports was 15.6% higher in 2008 than in 2007 (Fig. 1). The majority of domestic cases reported to both MAHs and Health Canada originated from health care professionals (Table 3).
The number of foreign AR reports received from MAHs was 241 417 (Fig. 2). At this time, foreign reports are not included in the Canada Vigilance database.
Health Canada would like to thank all who have contributed to the Canada Vigilance Program and encourages the continued support of postmarketing surveillance through AR reporting. Any suspected ARs associated with the use of health products can be reported to the Canada Vigilance Program by one of the following methods:
Postage-paid labels, the Canada Vigilance Reporting Form and the AR reporting guidelines ("Guidelines -- Voluntary Reporting of Suspected Adverse Reactions to Health Products by Health Professionals and Consumers"
) are available on the MedEffect™ Canada web site. The reporting form is also located in the back of the Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties (CPS).
| Source | No. (%) of reports | |
|---|---|---|
| MAH | 14 611 | (71.8) |
| Community* | 4 604 | (22.6) |
| Hospital | 1 013 | (5.0) |
| Other | 132 | (0.6) |
| Total: | 20 360 | (100.0) |
Note: MAH = Market Authorization Holder.
*Consumer, patient and non-hospital based health care
professionals.
| Product type | No. (%) of cases | |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmaceuticals | 11 596 | (71.3) |
| Biotechnology products | 3 303 | (20.3) |
| Biologics | 792 | (4.9) |
| Radio-pharmaceuticals | 292 | (1.8) |
| Natural health products | 289 | (1.8) |
| Total† | 16 272 | (100.0) |
*Cases result from the merge of initial and
duplicate reports.
†Total number of cases includes one suspect product identified in each adverse reaction case. A case may include more than one suspect product.
| Reporter type | No. (%) of cases | |
|---|---|---|
| Physician | 4 091 | (25.1) |
| Consumer | 3 132 | (19.2) |
| Pharmacist | 2 893 | (17.8) |
| Health professional† | 2 421 | (14.9) |
| Patient | 1 719 | (10.6) |
| Nurse | 1 489 | (9.2) |
| Coroner/medical examiner | 251 | (1.5) |
| Lawyer | 23 | (0.1) |
| Dentist | 4 | (0.02) |
| Naturopath | 3 | (0.02) |
| Other | 246 | (1.5) |
| Total‡: | 16 272 | (100.0) |
*Cases result from the merge of initial and duplicate reports.
†Type not specified in report.
‡Total number of cases may include more than one suspect product per adverse reaction case.
Fig. 1: Number of domestic reports of adverse reactions received by Health Canada from 2001 to 2008

Fig. 2: Number of foreign reports of adverse reactions received by Health Canada from 2001 to 2008

Medical device incidents
Medical device incidents are collected by the Health Product and Food Branch Inspectorate and are entered into the medical device system. The Inspectorate is responsible for compliance monitoring activities for a broad spectrum of regulated health products, including medical devices which range from adhesive bandages to pacemakers. It is also responsible for the delivery of a national compliance and enforcement program in an effort to minimize health risks to Canadians while maximizing the safety of health products. A major component of this program involves the collection, review and follow-up of incidents related to medical devices, which are reported to the Inspectorate via the submission of mandatory and voluntary problem reports. Manufacturers and importers are required to submit mandatory reports as per section 59-61 in the
Medical Device Regulations. Voluntary reports are submitted mostly by health care professionals and patients/users. In 2008, a total of 4491 incidents were entered into the medical device system. Of these reports, 4091 (91.0%) were mandatory and 400 (9.0%) voluntary.
Jennifer Lo, BSc, BA; Fannie St-Gelais, PhD; Shawn Hopewell, MSc, Health Canada
In December 2008, Health Canada issued a public advisory concerning the use of certain cough and cold medicines for children under the age of 12.
Health Canada’s new recommendations follow a review of additional data, including the input of a Scientific Advisory Panel convened in March 2008. Health Canada is working with manufacturers to revise the labelling of cough and cold products.
The public advisory, including the list of affected active ingredients, is available on the Health Canada web site.
Recent Canadian cases are selected based on their seriousness, frequency of occurrence or the fact that the reactions are unexpected. Case presentations are considered suspicions and are presented to stimulate reporting of similar suspected adverse reactions.
Energy drinks are popular and are widely available on the Canadian market. They are classified as natural health products and are promoted to provide energy and contribute to mental alertness and physical performance. 5-Hour Energy drink is not authorized for sale in Canada. However, it is available in a 2-ounce (59-mL) bottle and contains among its ingredients niacinamide 30 mg, vitamin B6 40 mg, folic acid 400 µg, vitamin B12 500 µg, sodium 10mg, and "Energy Blend"
(citicoline, glucuronolactone, N-acetyl L-tyrosine, L-phenylalanine, taurine, malic acid, caffeine). Labelling on the bottle states "For maximum energy, drink entire bottle at one time. For moderate energy, drink a half bottle or less"
and "Caution: contains about as much caffeine as a cup of coffee."
However, caffeine amounts in coffee vary according to brewing methods and coffee type. A plain brewed 250-mL cup of coffee contains 95 mg of caffeine.1
Health Canada received a report of a 55-year-old man who drank a 5-Hour Energy drink for lethargy. About 30 minutes to an hour later, he felt his heart beating rapidly and had chest pain. At the emergency department, his systolic blood pressure was 200 mm Hg. The patient was known to have a heart condition and was taking rosuvastatin, hydrochlorothiazide, acetylsalicylic acid, quinapril and long-acting diltiazem. He was released from hospital the same day after treatment with lorazepam.
Health Canada encourages the reporting of similar suspected adverse reactions to the Canada Vigilance Program.
References
The Canadian Adverse Reaction Newsletter (CARN) January 2009 issue was the last issue to be inserted into the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ). The CARN continues to be available on the MedEffect™ Canada web site and by subscribing to MedEffect™ e-Notice. Print versions are available to interested individuals upon request. In addition, in January 2009, highlights of the CARN were faxed out to hospitals and medical clinics. Highlights of the CARN can also be found in various health professional journals.
| Date | Product | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 5 | Oral Sodium Phosphate Products | Warning - purgative dose may lead to kidney injury |
| Mar 5 & 2 | Topical anesthetics | Information - serious adverse events |
| Mar 5 | Foreign products | Foreign product alerts |
| Feb 25 | Foreign products | Foreign product alerts |
| Feb 23 | Desferrioxamine Mesilate BP | Recall of two lots of 500 mg and 2g formats |
| Feb 20 | Raptiva | Suspension of marketing |
| Feb 17 | PregVit folic 5 & PregVit | Check product packaging |
| Feb 16 | Toothbrushes | Counterfeit toothbrushes |
| Feb 13 | Tysabri | Information - Progressive Multifocal Leukoencephalopathy (PML) |
| Jan 30 | Foreign products | Foreign product alerts |
| Jan 13 & Dec 22 | Botox / Botox Cosmetic | Additional safety information |
| Jan 7 & 2 | Fentanyl transdermal systems | Changes to the dose conversion guidelines |
| Jan 6 | Champix | Important safety information |
| Dec 31 | Dobutamine Hydrochloride | Recall of certain lots |
| Dec 23 | Piperacillin / Tazobactam | Recall of lot 7101490 |
| Dec 22 | Raptiva | Association with serious infections in patients with psoriasis |
| Dec 19 | Actos | Updated labelling for diabetes drug and risk of heart failure |
| Dec 18 | Cough and cold products | Health Canada's decision on cough and cold products |
| Dec 17 & 12 | Tarceva | Important safety information |
| Dec 16 | Avastin | Reports of eye adverse reactions following off-label intravitreal use |
| Dec 16 & 15 | Blood glucose meters | Risk of inaccurate blood glucose readings with certain glucose meters |
| Nov 27 | Kwan Loong Medicated Oil | Unauthorized natural health product may cause adverse health effects |
| Nov 26 | Firm Dose and Granite Rooster | Warning not to use these unauthorized products |
| Nov 18 | MabCampath | Infection-related deaths |
| Nov 17 | Foreign products | Foreign product alerts |
| Nov 11 | Liko Uno Patient Lift | Urgent medical device correction |
Health Canada
Marketed Health Products Directorate
Address Locator 0701C
Ottawa ON K1A 0K9
Telephone: 613-954-6522
Fax: 613-952-7738
Editorial Staff
Ann Sztuke-Fournier, BPharm (Editor-in-Chief)
Ilhemme Djelouah, BScPharm, RPh, DIS, AFSA, Medical Biology (University of Paris V)
Gilbert Roy, BPharm
Jared Cousins, BSP
Alanna Maloney, BHSc
Mary Joy, BScPharm, RPh
Candace Fisher, BSc, MSc
Acknowledgments
We thank the following members of the Expert Advisory Committee on the Vigilance of Health Products for their review of material for this issue: Colleen J. Metge, BSc(Pharm), PhD; Dugald Seely, ND, MSc; and Sylvia Hyland, RPh, BScPhm, MHSc.
Suggestions?
Your comments are important to us. Let us know what you think.
Reporting Adverse Reactions
Canada Vigilance Program
Telephone: 866-234-2345
Fax: 866-678-6789
Copyright
© 2009 Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada. This publication may be reproduced without permission provided the source is fully acknowledged. The use of this publication for advertising purposes is prohibited. Health Canada does not assume liability for the accuracy or authenticity of the information submitted in case reports.
Due to time constraints relating to the production of this publication, information published may not reflect the most current information.
ISSN 1499-9447; Cat no H42-4/1-19-2E
Aussi disponible en français.
Caveat: Adverse reactions (ARs) to health products are considered to be suspicions, as a definite causal association often cannot be determined. Spontaneous reports of ARs cannot be used to estimate the incidence of ARs because ARs remain underreported and patient exposure is unknown.