This HTML document is not a form. Its purpose is to display the information as found on the form for viewing purposes only. If you wish to use the form, you must use the alternate format below.
Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
Product Name
File No
Screener
Sub Type
Sub. No.
Manufacturer info (Name, address, contact info)
Manufacturer Contact for this submission (name, address, contact info)
Consultant Information (Name, address, contact info) (If applicable)
Forms
Submitted
Y/N
Fee Form (or A = adjusted?)
Submission Certification
3rd Party Authorization
Access Letter for DMF
(Indicate DMF number)
Dates of data
yyyy.mm.dd
LS / Vol.
Orig.
Data
rec'd
SDN sent
Resp. to SDN
SRN sent
Additional Data:
Submission Purpose:
Related Submissions:
Referenced Submissions:
Active Ingredient(s)
Strength(s)
Standard
Dosage Form
Route(s) of Administration
Therapeutic Class.
Species
Package Size(s)
Food
Non Food
Indication(s)
A copy of VDD's request and response from the GMP unit should be attached to the screening report.
Note: Submissions with GMP certificates that are close to expiring should be flagged
by the Screening Officer and a status update request will be made by the MCED reviewer
at the review stage.
(See Section 6.4.3)
Date requested (yyyy.mm.dd):
Date response received (yyyy.mm.dd):
Compliant? Y/ N. If Yes, then add date:
(yyyy.mm.dd)
Inner
Outer
Pkg. Insert
Indicate all package sizes received. Ensure there is a label for all sizes including package insert for all strengths submitted. Name, strength must match HC/SC 3011
Part I: Master Volume (Please check SOP for handling details)
ITEM
Y/N
ITEM
Y/N
Table of Contents
Language of Data
(English or French)
Patent Forms
(yyyy.mm.dd)
date received
date forwarded to OPML
Format & Pagination
Labels
Submission and Product Summary
General Legibility
Optional (Delete if not applicable)
Information Package for CFIA (if drug is intended for food producing animals):
See section 1.17 of SOP
Information Package for CFIA (for drug premix products):
See section 1.17 of SOP
Environmental data
See section 1.18 of SOP
Optional (Delete if not applicable)
AbNDS only (delete section if not applicable):
Canadian Ref. Product (CRP)
File No:
Active CRP DIN ? (Y/N)
CRP DIN #
Last CRP NOC
Waivers? (Y/N)
Item
Matches CRP?
(Y/N)
Item
Matches CRP? (Y/N)
CRP is the pioneer product?
Dosage Form
Route of Administration
Conditions of Use
Formulation
Strength
Pharmaceutical Equivalence Studies
Labels
Bioequivalence Studies
Withdrawal period? (food producing only)
Other considerations
Y / N
Formulation used in manufacturing identical in pharmaceutical studies and bioequivalence studies?
Full Residue studies? (Food producing only)
Summary of AbNDS (including justification of waivers if applicable - waivers can only be considered if pharmaceutical equivalence is established. See section C.08.002.1(c)(iii) of Food and Drug Regulations)
Date Submitted yyyy.mm.dd
No. of Original Vol.
No. Of Dup.
6.3
DRUG SUBSTANCE
REF to NDS Guidelines
Submitted
Y/N
6.3.1 General information
Nomenclature pg 24
Structure pg 24
Physiochemical Properties pg 24
Ensure a standard has been declared and verify its status in the appropriate documentation ie. USP -
6.3.2 Method of manufacture
Manufacturer complete address pg 27
Manufacturing process and process controls pg 28
Control of Materials used in drug substance production pg 29
Control of critical steps and isolated intermediates pg 29
Certificate of analysis for each material used in manufacture of drug substance should be provided SOP
Process validation protocol and report. pg 30
Note: Essential for Sterile Products ONLY
Manufacturing process development pg 30
6.3.4 Impurities
Potential impurities pg 32
Actual impurities detected pg 33
Comparative Impurities / degradation profiles with CRP (2 lots min) (AbNDS only) SOP
6.3.5 Control of the drug substance
Specification pg 34
Analytical procedures pg 35
Validation of analytical procedures pg 36
Batch analyses pg 37
6.3.6 Reference standards
Current CoA pg 38
6.3.8 Stability data for drug substance
6.4 DRUG PRODUCT REF to NDS Guidelines Y/N
6.4.1 Description of drug product pg 43
6.4.2 Pharmaceutical development pg 44
6.4.3 Method of Manufacture
Manufacturer's name and complete address pg 45
Formulae pg 45
Manufacturing process pg 46
Process validation pg 49
Control of excipients pg 51
6.4.4 Control of the drug product
Specifications pg 53
Comparative Impurities / degradation profiles with CRP (2 lots min) (AbNDS only) ---
Analytical procedures pg 58
Batch analyses: pg 59
CoA for Canadian Reference Product (2 lots min) (AbNDS only) SOP
6.4.5 Packaging
6.4.6 Stability
6.5 Drug Premixes REF to NDS Guidelines
Submitted
Y/N
6.5.1 Stability of medicated feed pg 69
6.5.2 Mixing studies pg 69
6.5.3 Premixes proposed for concurrent use (if applicable) pg 69
6.5.4 Feed assay validation pg 69
Summary For Chemistry & Manufacturing
Date Submitted yyyy.mm.dd
No. of Original Vol.
No. Of Dup.
Part III: ANIMAL SAFETY
REF to NDS Guidelines
Submitted
Y/N
7.1 Laboratory Animal Studies pg 72
7.2 Target Animal Studies pg 76
Note: Provide a summary of lab animal studies. Pay attention to what drug product was used in the Studies. Does it have the same formulation as that requested in the application? If not, is a justification for the discrepancy provided? If no specific details are provided concerning formulation, ask the company to provide clarification as to which pivotal studies are using the current proposed formulation.
If cross referencing other studies; provide a justification as to why these other studies are relevant. Include as much detail as possible. For example: check that the two studies used products with the same formulation, the same dose amount, the same dose frequency, the same indications for use, the same species. If uncertain of validity of findings, check with CED for confirmation.
Summary For Animal Safety
Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSURs)
Documentation submitted (Has the company been approved in other
jurisdictions (Y/N))
If No, then the rest of the questions do not apply
Applicable Country (ies)
Approximate duration in jurisdiction
Have any PSURs been included in the submission?
Date Submitted yyyy-mm-dd
No. Of Vol. of Original
No. Of Dup.
Part IV Efficacy
Submitted
Y/N
8.2.4 Clinical Pharmacology Studies pg 82
8.2.5 Dose Determination Studies pg 83
8.2.6 Dose Confirmation Studies pg 84
Comparative bioequivalence with CRP (AbNDS only) ---
REF to NDS GuidelinesNote: Provide a summary of efficacy studies. Pay attention to what drug product was used in the Studies. Does it have the same formulation as that requested in the application? If not, is a justification for the discrepancy provided? If no specific details are provided concerning formulation, ask the company to provide clarification as to which pivotal studies are using the current proposed formulation.
If cross referencing other studies; provide a justification as to why these other studies are relevant. Include as much detail as possible. For example: check that the two studies used products with the same formulation, the same dose amount, the same dose frequency, the same indications for use, the same species. If uncertain of validity of findings, check with CED for confirmation.
For ABNDS ONLY: waivers are assessed on a case by case basis. CED should be consulted in all cases.
Summary For Efficacy
Date Submitted yyyy.mm.dd
No. of Original Vol.
No. Of Dup.
Part V Human Safety
REF to NDS Guidelines
Submitted
Y/N
9.1 Laboratory Animal Toxicity Studies
Subchronic Oral Toxicity Studies pg 87
Carcinogenicity Studies (if applicable) pg 88
Multigeneration Reproductive Studies (2 generations) pg 90
Teratogenicity Studies pg 91
Short-term Tests for Genetic Toxicity Studies pg 91
9.2 Microbiological Safety Studies (for antimicrobial products) pg 93
9.3 Residue Studies
Metabolism Studies in the Intended Species (Radiotracer studies) pg 101
Comparative Metabolism Studies in the Laboratory Animals pg 101
Analytical Methodology pg 102
Validation of the Regulatory Method (s) for Detection and Confirmation of Residues of Veterinary Drugs in Food pg 102
Drug Residue Depletion Studies (Field studies) (For AbNDS, abbreviated studies are required) pg 103
Drugs for Concurrent Use in Combination (if applicable) pg 107
Identical withdrawal times with CRP (AbNDS only) ---
Note: Provide a summary of studies and show how it applies to the submission request. Pay attention to what drug product was used in the Studies. Does it have the same formulation as that requested in the application? If not, is a justification for the discrepancy provided? If no specific details are provided concerning formulation, ask the company to provide clarification as to which pivotal studies are using the current proposed formulation.
If cross referencing other studies; provide a justification as to why these other studies are relevant. Include as much detail as possible and include justifications if data is not present. For example: check that the two studies used products with the same formulation, the same dose amount, the same dose frequency, the same indications for use, the same species. If uncertain of validity of findings, check with HSD for confirmation.
Summary For Human Safety
MCED
CED
HSD
TOTAL
Fees Charged
(eg. $100 Section 2, Item 3)
Total Per Review Stream
If fee is
> $10K
n/a if paid in full
10%
Screening
40% after acceptance for review
50% final
Summary Of Fee Assessment
Received by VDD
For Acceptance for Review
A No Invoice (100% Paid)
B Invoice to equal 50%
Amount to be invoiced:
C Fee changed - amount owing > $10,000
Amount to be invoiced:
D Fee changed - amount owing < $10,000
Amount to be invoiced:
E Fee changed - credit > $10,000
Amount to be credited:
F Fee changed - credit < $10,000
Amount to be credited:
G Keyboard input (Additional paragraph regarding fees to be added
to the acceptance for review letter. This additional info requires the letter to be signed
by the screening officer)
Note: Attach the fee assessment verified/revised by the screening officer
Component invoicing required? If so, add applicable amount(s) to the tracking card.
CED
MCED
HSD
N/A
Amount
Amount
Amount
All data received to-date (see section A for details) needs to be routed to the following division(s) for Review:
CED
HSD
MCED
SKMD-SO
Submission purpose to be included in the Acceptance for Review letter
Additional paragraphs to be added to the Acceptance for Review letter. This additional info requires the letter to be signed by Screening Officer.
Additional notes for Submission Processing Clerk
Company Code - Check DPD. If code does not exist, send HC/SC 3011 Form to SIPD
Original screening comments (and Response to SDN comments if applicable)
SDN Response Screened by (if applicable):
Signature
Final Decision at Screening:
Accept for Review
Name:
Signature:
Date:
Reject at Screening
Name:
Signature:
Date: