| Consumer product type | Assumptions | Estimated concentrations and daily intakes |
|---|---|---|
Acrylic enamel aerosol spray paint2 |
Inhalation3
|
Air concentration = 9200 mg/m3 Estimated daily intake = 78.6 µg/ kg-bw per day |
Dermal4
|
Estimated daily intake = 0.10 µg/ kg-bw per day | |
| Latex wall paint5 | Inhalation6 |
Air concentration (Cp) = 250 mg/m3 Estimated lifetime average daily dose = 85 µg/kg-bw per day |
Dermal7
|
Estimated daily intake = 2.13 µg/ kg-bw per day | |
| Gasoline8 | Inhalation while pumping gas9
|
Maximum concentration =1.862 mg/m3 Estimated daily intake = 1.22 µg/ kg-bw per day |
| Cigarettes 10 | Inhalation from tobacco smoke11 - based on a maximum concentration of 19.3 µg/m3 measured
over a 4-hour period after 24- to 27-minute sessions of smoking
in an environmental chamber with a volume of 225 mL
12-19 years old:
20-59 years old:
60+ years old:
|
Maximum concentration = 0.0193 mg/m3 Estimated daily intake = 2.19 × 10-4 µg/kg-bw per day Estimated daily intake = 1.84 × 10-4 µg/kg-bw per day Estimated daily intake = 1.81 × 10-4 µg/kg-bw per day |
1 Since these products are used primarily by adults
(20-59 years old), estimated exposures have been derived for this
age group only, with the exception of cigarettes, for which exposure
for three age groups (12-19, 20-59 and 60+ years old) was considered.
2 Exposure to an aerosol spray paint was considered
representative of an acute exposure for paint products based on
use pattern parameters (compare with latex paint, footnote 5).
3 For this scenario, it was assumed that exposure occurred
only during the time the product was in use and that the total
amount of ethylbenzene released during each event was present in
the room air throughout the period of use (i.e., evaporation was
assumed to be instantaneous). Thus, the user of the product was
assumed to be exposed to the peak ethylbenzene concentration throughout
the exposure period. It was also assumed that the ethylbenzene
vapours were confined to the room where the product was used throughout
the exposure period (i.e., household air exchange rate was assumed
to be negligible throughout the exposure period). Also assumed
is 100% absorption across the lungs.
4 Dermal exposure may occur during use of aerosol spray
paints. A skin permeation coefficient (Kp) for ethylbenzene from
water of 0.517 cm/h has been estimated according to the equation
log Kp = -2.72 + 0.71 log Kow - 0.0061 MW, where Kow is the octanol/water
partition coefficient and MW is the molecular weight (U.S. EPA,
1992). Since ethylbenzene is assumed to comprise 40% of the paint
product, a Kp for the neat substance is considered more appropriate.
The relationship Kp(neat) = Kp(water) × (water
solubility / density of neat substance) has been determined (U.S.
EPA, 1992). Therefore, Kp(neat) was calculated to be
9.55 × 10-5 cm/h. For
this scenario, an acute exposure dose was calculated. It was assumed
that exposure occurred only during the time the product was in
use and that there was 100% absorption through the skin.
5 Exposure to a latex wall paint was considered representative
of a chronic exposure for paint products based on use pattern parameters
(compare with spray paint, footnote 2).
6 The Wall Paint Exposure Model was developed by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to estimate an individual's
inhalation exposure to a chemical in a latex wall paint, during
and after the time when a building is painted. It is a sophisticated
model that may give a more realistic output than simple equations
for inhalation exposure. The model's use of a certain number of
exposure events over a lifetime makes it appropriate for estimating
chronic exposure to a substance.
7 Dermal exposure may occur during use of wall paints.
A skin permeation coefficient (Kp) for ethylbenzene
from water of 0.517 cm/h has been estimated according to the equation
log Kp = -2.72 + 0.71 log Kow - 0.0061 MW, where Kow is
the octanol/water partition coefficient and MW is the molecular
weight (U.S. EPA, 1992). Since ethylbenzene is assumed to comprise
40% of the paint product, a Kp for the neat substance
is considered more appropriate. The relationship Kp(neat)
= Kp(water) × (water solubility/density
of neat substance) has been determined (U.S. EPA, 1992). Therefore
Kp(neat) was calculated to be 9.55 × 10-5 cm/h.
For this scenario, a lifetime chronic exposure dose was calculated.
It was assumed that there was 100% absorption through the skin.
8 Ethylbenzene occurs naturally in gasoline and may
also be used as a fuel additive. Estimated exposures have been
derived for the average Canadian adult (20-59 years old).
9 The study by PACE (1987) involved taking air samples
from pump operators at full-serve stations and kiosk operators
at self-serve stations. For this scenario, the maximum concentration
used was measured for pump operators at full-serve stations. Samples
from kiosk operators at self-serve stations were also taken in
the study; however, they are not involved with filling the gas
tank and are not considered representative of the average Canadian
adult. The duration of exposure was assumed to be the same as the
short-term sample times from the study. It is noted that the sample
time may represent three to five gas fill-ups for a pump operator;
therefore, the duration of exposure used in the scenario may overestimate
the actual potential dose for an average adult.
10 Daisey et al. (1994) measured
volatile organic compounds over a 4-hour period after 24- to 27-minute
sessions of smoking in an environmental chamber. The average concentrations
of ethylbenzene in environmental tobacco smoke ranged from 11.5
to 19.3 µg/m3 (detection
limit not stated). The estimated daily intake was not included
in the total intake estimate, as active exposure (i.e., smoking)
to ethylbenzene from cigarettes may not be representative of the
general Canadian population.
11 Doses were calculated for three relevant age groups.
Exposure resulting from cigarette smoking was not included in the
calculation of total intake, as cigarette smoke may have contributed
to measured indoor air levels.