Priority Substances List Assessment Report for Acrolein

1.0 Introduction

The Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA 1999) requires the federal Ministers of the Environment and of Health to prepare and publish a Priority Substances List (PSL) that identifies substances, including chemicals, groups of chemicals, effluents and wastes, that may be harmful to the environment or constitute a danger to human health. The Act also requires both Ministers to assess these substances and determine whether they are "toxic" or are capable of becoming "toxic" as defined in Section 64 of the Act, which states:

...a substance is toxic if it is entering or may enter the environment in a quantity or concentration or under conditions that

1. have or may have an immediate or long-term harmful effect on the environment or its biological diversity;
2. constitute or may constitute a danger to the environment on which life depends; or
3. constitute or may constitute a danger in Canada to human life or health.

Substances that are assessed as "toxic" as defined in Section 64 may be placed on Schedule I of the Act and considered for possible risk management measures, such as regulations, guidelines, pollution prevention plans or codes of practice to control any aspect of their life cycle, from the research and development stage through manufacture, use, storage, transport and ultimate disposal.

Based on initial screening of readily accessible information, the rationale for assessing acrolein provided by the Ministersí Expert Advisory Panel on the Second Priority Substances List (Ministersí Expert Advisory Panel, 1995) was as follows:

• Exposure to acrolein appears to be widespread in Canada. This substance has been detected in indoor and outdoor air, food and cigarette smoke. It is expected to be present in the effluents in manufacturing processes that use it as an intermediate in the production of other substances. Photooxidation of diesel and gasoline exhaust are other sources. Low levels of exposure have produced toxicological effects in animals and humans. Data indicate that acrolein is genotoxic and causes reproductive and developmental effects in animals. Information on this substance has been gathered, reviewed and evaluated by an international group of experts. An assessment of acrolein in the Canadian environment and of the concentrations that cause adverse effects is required to evaluate its potential impact on human health.

Descriptions of the approaches to assessment of the effects of Priority Substances on the environment and human health are available in published companion documents. The document entitled "Environmental Assessments of Priority Substances under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act. Guidance Manual Version 1.0 - March 1997" (Environment Canada, 1997a) provides guidance for conducting environmental assessments of Priority Substances in Canada. This document may be purchased from:

• Environmental Protection Publications
  Environmental Technology Advancement Directorate
  Environment Canada
  Ottawa, Ontario
  K1A 0H3

It is also available on the Internet at www.ec.gc.ca/cceb1/eng/psap.htm under the heading "Technical Guidance Manual." It should be noted that the approach outlined therein has evolved to incorporate recent developments in risk assessment methodology and which will be addressed in future releases of the guidance manual for environmental assessments of Priority Substances.

The approach to assessment of effects on human health is outlined in the following publication of the Environmental Health Directorate of Health Canada: "Canadian Environmental Protection Act - Human Health Risk Assessment for Priority Substances" (Health Canada, 1994), copies of which are available from:

• Environmental Health Centre
  Room 104
  Health Canada
  Tunney's Pasture
  Ottawa, Ontario
  K1A 0L2

or on the Environmental Health Directorate publications web site (www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ehp/ehd/ catalogue/bch.htm). The approach is also described in an article published in the Journal of Environmental Science and Health -Environmental Carcinogenesis & Ecotoxicology Reviews (Meek et al., 1994). It should be noted that the approach outlined therein has evolved to incorporate recent developments in risk assessment methodology, which are described on the Environmental Substances Division web site (www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ehp/ehd/bch/env_ contaminants/psap/psap.htm) and which will be addressed in future releases of the approach paper for the assessment of effects on human health.

The search strategies employed in the identification of data relevant to assessment of potential effects on the environment (prior to May 1998) and human health (prior to October 1998) are presented in Appendix A. Review articles were consulted where appropriate. However, all original studies that form the basis for determining whether acrolein is "toxic" under CEPA 1999 have been critically evaluated by staff of Environment Canada (entry and environmental exposure and effects) and Health Canada (human exposure and effects on human health).

Sections of this Assessment Report and the supporting documentation (Environment Canada, 1998) related to the environmental assessment of acrolein were prepared by the following members of the Environmental Resource Group at Environment Canada:

• M. Eggleton
• F. Onuska
• M. Romano
• J. Sherry
• W. Windle

Other members of the Environmental Resource Group who reviewed the documents and participated in discussions were:

• L. Brownlee, Environment Canada
• N. Bunce, University of Guelph
• R. Chénier, Environment Canada
• T. Dann, Environment Canada
• R. Doane, Baker Petrolite Corporation, formerly BPCI
• P. Gibson, Baker Petrolite Corporation, formerly BPCI
• W.F. Mayr, Degussa AG, Germany
• L. Patenaude, Environment Canada
• J. Wittwer, Environment Canada

Environmental sections of the Assessment Report and the supporting documentation (Environment Canada, 1998) were also reviewed by internal reviewers at Environment Canada - namely, D. Campbell, L. Graham, D. Halliburton and K. Lloyd - as well as by external reviewers: C. Jacobs (Degussa AG, Germany), R. Parent (Consultox Ltd.), G. Rawn (Fisheries and Oceans Canada), S. Semeniuk (E.B. Eddy Forest Products Ltd.), N. Tolson (Pest Management Regulatory Agency) and J. van Koten (The Netherlands' National Institute of Public Health and the Environment).

The health-related sections of this Assessment Report and supporting documentation were prepared by the following staff of Health Canada:

• R. Beauchamp
• R. Gomes
• R. Liteplo
• M.E. Meek

Sections of the Assessment Report and supporting documentation on genotoxicity were reviewed by D. Blakey of the Environmental and Occupational Toxicology Division of Health Canada. Sections of the supporting documentation pertaining to human health were reviewed externally by R. Parent (Consultox Ltd.) and W.F. Mayr and S. Jacobi (both from Degussa AG), primarily to address adequacy of coverage. Accuracy of reporting, adequacy of coverage and defensibility of conclusions with respect to hazard characterization and doseñresponse analyses were considered in written review by staff of the Information Department of BIBRA International and at a panel meeting of the following members, convened by Toxicology Excellence for Risk Assessment (TERA) on November 16, 1998, in Cincinnati, Ohio:

• M. Aardema, Procter & Gamble
• J. Christopher, California Environmental Protection Agency
• M. Dourson, TERA
• M. Friedman, private consultant
• M. Gargas, ChemRisk Division of McLaren/Hart
• H. Heck, The Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology (written comments)
• G. Leikauf, University of Cincinnati
• M. Moore, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
• R. Tardiff, The Sapphire Group, Inc.
• V. Vu, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
• V. Walker, New York State Department of Health

The health-related sections of the Assessment Report were reviewed and approved by the Health Protection Branch Risk Management meeting of Health Canada.

The entire Assessment Report was reviewed and approved by the Environment Canada/Health Canada CEPA Management Committee.

A draft of the Assessment Report was made available for a 60-day public comment period (May 1 to June 29, 1999) (Environment Canada and Health Canada, 1999). Following consideration of comments received, the Assessment Report was revised as appropriate. A summary of the comments and their responses is available on the Internet at:

www.ec.gc.ca/cceb1/eng/final/index_e.html

The text of the Assessment Report has been structured to address environmental effects initially (relevant to determination of ìtoxicî under Paragraphs 64(a) and (b)), followed by effects on human health (relevant to determination of ìtoxicî under Paragraph 64(c)).

Copies of this Assessment Report are available upon request from:

• Inquiry Centre
  Environment Canada
  Main Floor, Place Vincent Massey
  351 St. Joseph Blvd.
  Hull, Quebec
  K1A 0H3

or on the Internet at:

www.ec.gc.ca/cceb1/eng/final/index_e.html

Unpublished supporting documentation, which presents additional information, is available upon request from:

• Commercial Chemicals Evaluation Branch
  Environment Canada
  14th Floor, Place Vincent Massey
  351 St. Joseph Blvd.
  Hull, Quebec K1A 0H3

or

• Environmental Health Centre
  Room 104
  Health Canada
  Tunney's Pasture
  Ottawa, Ontario
  K1A 0L2