To make it easier for the reader to follow the discussion of our findings, we categorized the familial coping techniques used in this study using principal components analysis. This categorization (Table 20) shows that Canadian families use five different sets of coping strategies in their attempt to deal with work-life conflict: (1) restructure and redefine family roles, (2) put family first, (3) sacrifice personal needs and standards, (4) seek social support, and (5) procure outside help.45
Data on the availability and use of the different family coping strategies are summarized in Table 21 (Total Sample) and 22 (Gender by Dependent Care and Gender by Job Type). These data indicate that Canadian families use a wide variety of strategies to cope with stress.
N varies with question
Rarely is a combination of disagree and disagree strongly that they
use this strategy.
Sometimes is a neutral response to this question.
Often
is a combination of agree and agree strongly that they use this
strategy.
| Family Coping Strategies | % Who Use Frequently | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Males | Females | |||
| Mgr/Prof | Other | Mgr/Prof | Other | |
| Get by on less sleep that I would like | 55 | 48 | 61 | 53 |
| Leave some things undone around the house | 74 | 67 | 86 | 78 |
| Get the children to help with household chores | 49 | 48 | 58 | 56 |
| Plan family time together | 43 | 41 | 55 | 49 |
| Hire help to care for elderly relatives | 22 | 20 | 28 | 27 |
| Hire help to care for the children | 35 | 32 | 56 | 45 |
| Covering household responsibilities for each other | 78 | 75 | 75 | 66 |
| Leaving work-related problems at work | 45 | 55 | 45 | 56 |
| Modifying the work schedule | 26 | 20 | 26 | 22 |
| Relying on extended family for help | 25 | 24 | 36 | 32 |
| Relying on friends for help | 14 | 16 | 19 | 17 |
| Planning work changes around family needs | 45 | 32 | 43 | 35 |
| Identifying one partner as primarily responsible for household tasks | 34 | 31 | 31 | 28 |
| Buying more goods and services | 42 | 35 | 55 | 42 |
| Encouraging children to help each other | 68 | 70 | 72 | 71 |
| Trying to be flexible | 77 | 72 | 79 | 74 |
| Cutting down on outside activities | 56 | 47 | 66 | 52 |
| Limiting job involvement to allow time for family | 32 | 32 | 42 | 39 |
Approximately three quarters of the survey respondents cope with work-life issues by sacrificing personal needs (77% leave things undone around the house) and restructuring their family-role expectations (76% try to be flexible, 72% cover household responsibilities for each other, 71% encourage their children to help each other). Furthermore, just over half of the respondents cope by cutting down on outside activities (56%), getting by on less sleep (54%) and getting their children to help with household tasks (53%).
These strategies all have one thing in common -- they deal with work-life issues by making accommodations within one's personal and/or family life. They also converge on two factors: strengthen and restructure one's family role, and sacrifice one's own personal needs.46 This suggests that families cope by putting work first -- ahead of family and personal life.
Many Canadians attempt to deal with work-life conflict issues by purchasing help from outside the family unit. Just under half (45%) buy goods and services and 42% hire help from outside to care for their children. Just over one in four (26%) hire help to care for elderly dependents. It is interesting to note that Canadians are more likely to try to "buy" balance than they are to ask extended family (30%) or friends (17%) for help.
A substantive minority of Canadian employees seem to buck the trend of expecting family members to adapt to the employee's work situation and instead of using employee coping strategies that put family first. They do this by trying to leave work problems at work (i.e. 50% try to psychologically separate their work and non-work domains), limiting their job involvement to give time to the family (37%), planning work changes around family needs (36%), identifying one partner as being responsible for household tasks (31%) and by modifying their work schedule to accommodate their family schedule (24%).
Examination of Table 22 indicates that the use of all but two of the family coping strategies examined in this study (rely on friends and get children to help each other) are associated with gender, dependent care status and/or job type. Key between-group differences are highlighted in the section below.
Regardless of the type of job they hold, or the dependent care responsibilities they have, women were more likely than men to try to cope with work-life issues by putting their own needs second and purchasing supports from outside the family. They were more likely than men to engage in all the strategies in the "sacrifice personal needs" (get by on less sleep, leave some things undone around the house, cut down on outside activities, buy more goods and services) and purchase supports from outside the family (hire help to care for elderly relatives and for children). Women were also significantly more likely than men to:
It is interesting to note that there are no strategies that are more likely to be used by men than women across both job type and dependent care status.
Managers and professionals, regardless of their gender and their dependent care status, are more likely to try to cope by modifying their work schedule (it will be recalled that this group is more likely to use flexible work arrangements) and plan work changes around family needs. These findings may reflect the fact that highly educated managers and professionals have more ability to negotiate such things with their employer than those in other positions in the organization.
Managers and professionals are more likely than those in other positions to cope by sacrificing personal needs. They get by on less sleep, leave things undone around the house, buy more goods and services (female managers and professionals in particular are likely to use this strategy) and cut down on outside activities. These findings are consistent with the fact that employees in this group have heavier work demands. Given the fact that the hours in a day remain constant, these findings suggest that employees in this group have to sacrifice time that they would typically spend on socializing and sleeping to meet work and family demands. Consistent with these findings is the fact that managers and professionals are more likely to say that they cope by "trying to be flexible."
Those in other positions in the organization are more likely than managers and professionals to indicate that they cope with work and family issues by leaving work-related problems at work and covering household responsibilities for each other. That being said, it should be noted that women in other positions within the organization were significantly less likely to use this strategy than their male counterparts.
Men and women with dependent care are more likely than those without dependent care to cope by engaging in strategies that put family first and sacrificing personal needs. Specifically, with respect to sacrificing personal needs, they:
In all three cases, it is important to note that these differences can be attributed to the fact that women with dependent care responsibilities are more likely to use this strategy than their male counterparts. There were no gender differences in the use of these strategies for those without dependents.
Employees with dependent care were also more likely to:
Again, there are a number of significant gender differences within these findings that are important to note. Women with dependents are more likely to plan work changes around their family and limit their job involvement to allow time for their family than their male counterparts. Men with dependents, on the other hand, are more likely to identify one partner (their spouse) as having primary responsibility for the family. No such gender differences in use were apparent for employees without dependents. These findings are interesting as they suggest that women are still the ones who are expected to (and perhaps want to) sacrifice personal career goals for their family. These findings are also consistent with the fact that women still earn less than men, even when job type is controlled for, and suggest that this situation will not change until the family role is more equitably shared.
45 It should be noted that this is the same factor structure reported by Skinner and McCubbin (1987). As such, we felt it was appropriate to use the same names for these factors as those reported by these authors.
46 It should be noted that the other two strategies associated with these two factors, plan family time together (used often by 48% of the sample) and buy more goods and services (used by 45% of respondents) are also used by a plurality of the sample.