Étude nationale des cliniques de mammographie canadiennes

8. Renvois

1. Wichmann, B. et Hill, D., Building a Random Number Generator, Byte, Mars, 1987, p. 127-128.

2. Suleiman, O.H. et al, Automatic Film Processing : Analysis of 9 Years of Observations, Radiology, 185, 1, (Octobre 1992):25-28.

3. Santé Canada, Code de sécurité 33 - Radioprotection dans l'exercice de la mammographie, Groupe Communication Canada - Édition, Ottawa (1995).

4. Conway, B.J., Suleiman, O.H., Rueter, F.G. et al, National Survey of Mammographic Facilities in 1985, 1988 and 1992, Radiology , 191, 2, (Mai 1994):323-330.

5.  Suleiman, O.H., Conway, B.J., Spelic, Fuller, R. et al, Mammography Quality: The X-Ray Equipment and the Processor, Scientific Exhibit (Chicago: The Radiological Society of North America , 1995).

6. Suleiman, O.H., Belella, S., Finder, C., Fuller, R., et al, Mammography Quality: A Comparison of First and Second-Year Inspections, Scientific Exhibit (Chicago: The Radiological Society of North America , 1996).

7. P. Dvorak, X-ray Section, Santé Canada, entretien privé

8. Spelic, D., Suleiman, O.H., Fuller, R. et al, Image Quality in Mammography: What is the Optimal Film Density?, Scientific Exhibit (Chicago: The Radiological Society of North America , 1995).

9. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, 21 CFR Part 900 - Mammography Quality Standards; Proposed Rules, (Washington: The Federal Register, 3 avril 1996).