While recommended dose limits have been defined for radiation workers and members of the public, there is no specific permissible level recommended for patients undergoing diagnostic X-rays procedures. However, it is possible to recommend limits on the amount of radiation breast tissues receive by setting dose limits on the level of radiation a representative breast phantom would receives for a given irradiation. This breast phantom represents a breast which is composed of 50 percent fat and 50 percent glandular tissues and is compressed to 45 mm thickness. The dose received by the phantom would become a representative mean glandular dose for a breast of similar composition and thickness when compressed.
A mammographic X-ray system producing phantom dose estimates greater than the values set in Table 8 would use more radiation than necessary to produce quality mammographic images and the performance of the mammographic X-ray system and film processing would need to be reassessed.
These glandular dose estimates are calculated by measuring the phantom surface dose while the mammographic X-ray equipment is operated in a normal fashion. The surface dose values are then applied to Table 9 to obtain the mean glandular dose.
| Procedure | Mean Glandular Dose Limits |
| Film-Screen Mammography (no grid) |
1.0 mGy (100 mrad) |
| Film-Screen Mammography (grid technique) |
2.0 mGy (200 mrad) |
| Xeromammography | 4.0 mGy (400 mrad) |
| Mo Target / Mo FilerX-ray Tube Voltage (kVp) | W Target Al Filter Combination |
|||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVL | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | |
| 0.23 | 109 | |||||||||||
| 0.24 | 113 | 116 | ||||||||||
| 0.25 | 117 | 120 | 122 | |||||||||
| 0.26 | 121 | 124 | 126 | 128 | ||||||||
| 0.27 | 126 | 128 | 130 | 132 | 134 | |||||||
| 0.28 | 130 | 132 | 134 | 136 | 138 | 139 | ||||||
| 0.29 | 135 | 137 | 139 | 141 | 142 | 143 | 144 | |||||
| 0.30 | 139 | 141 | 143 | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 170 | |||
| 0.31 | 144 | 146 | 147 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | 175 | ||
| 0.32 | 148 | 150 | 151 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 156 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 160 | 180 |
| 0.33 | 153 | 154 | 155 | 157 | 158 | 159 | 160 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 164 | 185 |
| 0.34 | 157 | 159 | 160 | 161 | 162 | 163 | 164 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 168 | 190 |
| 0.35 | 163 | 164 | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 172 | 194 | |
| 0.36 | 168 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 176 | 199 | ||
| 0.37 | 174 | 175 | 176 | 177 | 178 | 178 | 179 | 180 | 204 | |||
| 0.38 | 179 | 180 | 181 | 182 | 182 | 183 | 184 | 208 | ||||
| 0.39 | 184 | 185 | 186 | 186 | 187 | 188 | 213 | |||||
| 0.40 | 189 | 190 | 191 | 192 | 192 | 217 | ||||||
| 0.41 | 194 | 195 | 196 | 196 | 221 | |||||||
| 0.42 | 200 | 200 | 225 | |||||||||
| 0.43 | 204 | 230 | ||||||||||
| 0.44 | 234 | |||||||||||
| 0.45 | 238 | |||||||||||
1Wu X, "Breast Dosimetry in Screen-film Mammography." published in "Screen film mammography; imaging considerations and medical physics responsibilities." Madison, WI, Medical Physics Publishing: 159-175 (1991). Stanton et al. "Dosage evaluation in mammography." Radiology 150:577-584 (1984).