Health Canada
Symbol of the Government of Canada
Environmental and Workplace Health

Sulphate

1987

Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.

Table of Contents

The aesthetic objective for sulphate in drinking water is ≤500 mg/L, based on taste considerations. Because of the possibility of adverse physiological effects at higher concentrations, it is also recommended that health authorities be notified of sources of drinking water that contain sulphate concentrations in excess of 500 mg/L.

General

Sulphur is a non-metallic element; its common valences are -2, -1, 0, +4 and +6. The three most important sources of sulphur for commercial use are elemental sulphur, hydrogen sulphide (H2S, found innatural gas and crude oil) and metal sulphides such as iron pyrites. Hexavalent sulphur combines with oxygen to form the divalent sulphate ion (SO42-). Sulphates occur naturally in numerous minerals, including barite (BaSO4), epsomite (MgSO4·7H2O) and gypsum (CaSO4·2H2O).Footnote 1 The reversible interconversion of sulphate and sulphide in the natural environment is known as the "sulphur cycle."Footnote 2 ,Footnote 3

Sulphur, principally in the form of sulphuric acid, is one of the most widely used chemicals in industrialized society. Most sulphur is converted into sulphuric acid, close to 60% of which is used for the production of phosphate and ammonium sulphate fertilizers. World production of sodium sulphate in 1988 was estimated to be approximately 4 million tonnes; 342 076 t were produced in Canada in 1987, whereas the United States and Europe produced 985 000 t and 1.8 million tonnes, respectively.Footnote 4

Sulphates or sulphuric acid products are also used in the manufacture of numerous chemicals, dyes, glass, paper, soaps, textiles, fungicides, insecticides, astringents and emetics. They are also used in the mining, pulping, metal and plating industries, in sewage treatment and in leather processing.Footnote 1 Aluminum sulphate (alum) is used as a sedimentation agent in the treatment of drinking water, and copper sulphate has been used for the control of blue-green algae in both raw water and public water supplies in the United States.Footnote 5 ,Footnote 6

Salt cake (sodium sulphate) is often produced in regions where natural brine deposits occur. Salt cake consumption has declined in recent years owing to the introduction of new methods in the chemical pulping of wood (the major use for this mineral), which require less salt cake. In 1975, 256 385 t were consumed in Canada, compared with 188 626 t in 1984. The use of salt cake as a diluent in detergents has been estimated to account for 10% of total consumption.Footnote 4

Occurrence

Sodium, potassium and magnesium sulphates are all soluble in water, whereas calcium and barium sulphates and the heavy metal sulphates are not. Dissolved sulphate may be reduced to sulphide, volatilized to the air as hydrogen sulphide, precipitated as an insoluble salt or incorporated in living organisms.Footnote 7

Sulphates are discharged into the aquatic environment in wastes from industries that use sulphates and sulphuric acid, such as mining and smelting operations, kraft pulp and paper mills, textile mills and tanneries.Footnote 7,Footnote 8 Atmospheric sulphur dioxide (SO2), formed by the combustion of fossil fuels and by the metallurgical roasting process, may also contribute to the sulphate content of surface waters. It has frequently been observed that the levels of sulphate in surface water correlate with the levels of sulphur dioxide in emissions from anthropogenic sources. In the Sudbury region in Ontario, for example, it was found that water quality changes such as an increase in pH and a decrease in sulphate, nickel and copper levels coincided with a reduction in sulphur dioxide emissions from the Sudbury metal smelters.Footnote 9

Sulphur trioxide (SO3), produced by the photolytic or catalytic oxidation of sulphur dioxide, combines with water vapour to form dilute sulphuric acid, which falls as "acid" rain or snow.Footnote 7 Sulphate concentrations in rain in Canada ranged between 1.0 and 3.8 mg/L in 1980,Footnote 10 whereas concentrations ranging from 3 to 7 mg/L had previously been measured in Toronto.Footnote 11 Measurements of snowpack (March) and rainfall (between March and April) sulphate deposition in the Algoma region of Ontario indicate levels of 7.81 and 11.01 meq/m2, respectively.Footnote 12

Sulphate levels in Canadian lakes typically range from 3 to 30 mg/L.Footnote 13 Recent data from Ontario show similar levels in small lakes (12.7 ± 11.3 mg/L); sulphate concentrations were 7.6 mg/L in Lake Superior at Thunder Bay and 19 mg/L in Lake Huron at Goderich.Footnote 14 In a survey of river waters in western Canada, concentrations of sulphate ranged from 1 to 3040 mg/L; most concentrations were below 580 mg/L.Footnote 15

Data compiled by three Canadian provinces (Nova Scotia, Saskatchewan and Alberta) indicate that, in the years 1976 to 1977, sulphate concentrations in municipal water supplies ranged from less than 10 mg/L to 1795 mg/L.Footnote 16 Levels in central Canada were particularly high; approximately 13% of the 428 sampling locations in Saskatchewan and Alberta had sulphate concentrations in excess of 500 mg/L. In Saskatchewan, between 1970 and 1989, median levels of 368 mg/L and 97 mg/L were determined for treated drinking water from groundwater and surface water supplies, respectively, with a range of 3 to 2170 mg/L.Footnote 19 The mean sulphate level in municipal drinking water supplies in 78 locations in Nova Scotia during 1987 to 1988 was 14.2 mg/L (range 2.0 to 110.0 mg/L).Footnote 20 In a 1989 municipal water supply survey in Nova Scotia, mean sulphate concentrations were 12.1 mg/L (N=102) in treated supplies and 15.0 mg/L (N=87) in raw supplies; a maximum of 79.0 mg/L was recorded.Footnote 21 Monitoring of 17 municipal water supplies in Ontario during 1985 and 1986 found the mean sulphate concentration in the untreated water to be 12.5 mg/L, increasing to 22.5 mg/L after treatment; a maximum concentration of 83.6 mg/L was recorded in the distribution system of one water treatment plant where the sulphate concentration prior to treatment had been only 1.9 mg/L.Footnote 14

Seawater contains about 2700 mg sulphate per litre,Footnote 22 and it has been estimated that 1.7 million tonnes of sulphate are added annually to the Canadian atmosphere from sea spray.Footnote 13 Canadian anthropogenic sources such as base metal smelting, sour gas processing and fuel combustion contribute an estimated 3.0 million tonnes of sulphate to the atmosphere, and transboundary flow from 20 major northern U.S. locations contributes another 3.4 million tonnes.Footnote 13

The level of sulphate in air has been monitored in a number of Canadian locations. A temporal study undertaken in Edmonton from 1978 to 1979 showed that the mean concentration in air was 2.1 ± 1.1 µg/m3 (N=15, range 0.3 to 4.1 µg/m3), with the lowest mean values being recorded in November (1.7 µg/m3) and the highest in July/August (2.7 µg/m3).Footnote 10 During the winter of 1983 to 1984, a sulphate concentration of 0.72 µg/m3was measured in Portage la Prairie, Manitoba, and a concentration of 2.75 µg/m3 was measured in Tillsonburg, Ontario.Footnote 23 The mean sulphate concentration in air recorded in 52 stations in Ontario during 1985 was 7.0 ± 1.7 µg/m3, with a range of 3.0 to 12.6 µg/m3.Footnote 24 In a recent survey of sulphate concentrations from 31 mostly urban sites across Canada between 1984 and 1993, mean concentrations (N=8123) ranged from 1.6 µg/m3 (Edmonton) to 6.3 µg/m3 (Windsor); a maximum of 41.5 µg/m3 was also recorded in Windsor.Footnote 25 The data also indicate that average ambient sulphate concentrations in eastern Canada are nearly twice as high as those in western Canada. In a nationwide (U.S.) survey of 23 664 ambient air samples from 405 sites over the period 1976 to 1981, sulphate concentrations ranged between 0.5 and 228.4 µg/m3, with the mean values in each city ranging from 0.82 to 31.49 µg/m3.Footnote 26

No data on the sulphate content of foodstuffs were identified; however, both sulphites and sulphates are used as firming agents and preservatives in the food industry.Footnote 27,Footnote 28 A portion of the sulphide present in foods may also be oxidized to sulphate in the gastrointestinal tract.Footnote 29

Canadian Exposure

Data concerning the daily dietary intake of sulphates by Canadians were not found. Tabulations of possible dietary intakes of a variety of sulphate compounds used as additives in U.S. foods are available. Estimates from these data, based on food consumption values and reported usage of sulphates as additives, indicate that these substances contribute an average of 453 mg to the daily sulphate intake of Americans.Footnote 30,Footnote 31 The average daily intake of sulphur in food by adults is estimated to be 930 mg, based on dietary surveys and data on food composition, and 1100 mg, based on the assumption that the sulphur content of foods is derived from protein and is proportionately related to the nitrogen content.Footnote 32

If one assumes a daily drinking water consumption of 1.5 L and a sulphate concentration in drinking water of 22.5 mg/L (the mean concentration in treated drinking water from the Ontario survey),Footnote 14 the daily intake of sulphate from this source would be less than 35 mg. However, in areas with much higher sulphate levels in drinking water, such as Saskatchewan,Footnote 19 daily intake from this source could be over 3000 mg.

If one assumes sulphate concentrations in air of 0.006 mg/m3 for eastern Canada and 0.002 mg/m3 for western Canada,Footnote 25 and if daily respiratory volume is 20 m3 of air, then daily exposure of an adult to sulphate via the inhalation route would be 0.1 mg in eastern Canada and 0.04 mg in western Canada.

Average daily intake of sulphate from drinking water, air and food is therefore approximately 500 mg, with food being the major source. However, in areas where drinking water supplies contain high levels of sulphate, such as Saskatchewan, drinking water may constitute the principal source of intake.

Analytical Methods and Treatment Technology

Sulphate in aqueous solutions may be determined by ion chromatography using a conductivity detector; the detection limit for this method is about 0.05 mg/L.Footnote 33

Because sulphate is highly soluble and relatively stable in water, it cannot be effectively removed using conventional water treatment processes. However, the addition of sulphate-containing chemicals to the water during the water treatment process can be reduced or eliminated.Footnote 34 In general, only demineralization techniques are effective for sulphate removal.Footnote 35

Health Considerations

Essentiality

No symptoms of sulphate deficiency have been reported in humans. No optimum dietary intake for inorganic sulphate has been suggested, mainly because the cysteine and methionine contained in dietary proteins may be oxidized to provide sulphate.

Absorption, Distribution and Excretion

In a study on seven human volunteers, it was found that about 30% or more of an orally administered dose of 13.9 g of radioactively labelled magnesium sulphate heptahydrate was recovered in the urine within 24 hours.Footnote 36 In a similar study in which five healthy men ingested 18.1 g of sodium sulphate decahydrate, 43.5% of the dose was recovered in the urine within 24 hours.Footnote 37 Approximately 73% of the dietary dose of calcium or magnesium sulphate salts administered to adult male Wistar rats was absorbed.Footnote 38 However, the amount ingested, the nature of the accompanying anion and the presence of certain dietary components influence the amount of sulphate absorbed.Footnote 38 Low doses are generally absorbed well; at higher doses (such as would be used to induce catharsis), however, the absorptive capacity is probably exceeded, so that much of the dose is excreted in the faeces.

The serum concentration of sulphate in humans ranges between 1.4 and 4.8 mg/100 mL, with a mean of about 3.1 mg/100 mL. Sulphate is present in all body tissues but is found in the highest concentration in the connective tissues, where it is present as chondroitin sulphates,Footnote 39,Footnote 40 and in the metabolically active areas of bone and teeth formation. It has been suggested that sulphated protein polysaccharides may be involved in the regulation of bone development.Footnote 41

Excess sulphate in the blood is rapidly eliminated by urinary excretion,Footnote 42,Footnote 43 although some may be excreted in the bileFootnote 44,Footnote 45 and pancreatic fluidFootnote 44; as well, some reabsorption may occur in the renal proximal tubule,Footnote 46 especially if the quantities of sulphate ingested are sufficiently large to saturate tubular reabsorption.Footnote 47 About 800 mg of elemental sulphur are eliminated daily through the urine of humans, compared with 140 mg in the faeces.Footnote 32 Some 85% of urinary sulphur is present as inorganic sulphates and a further 10% as organic sulphates, whereas the remainder is excreted as conjugated alkyl sulphates.Footnote 48 In humans, sulphate excretion is usually 0.20 to 0.25 mmol/kg bw per day,Footnote 49 although children have a substantially higher excretion rate on a body weight basis.

Toxic Effects

Sulphate is one of the least toxic anions. The lethal dose for humans as potassium or zinc sulphate is 45 g. The reported minimum lethal dose of magnesium sulphate in mammals is 200 mg/kg.Footnote 50

Sulphate doses of 1000 to 2000 mg (14 to 29 mg/kg bw) have a cathartic effect on humans, resulting in purgation of the alimentary canal.Footnote 8 Water containing magnesium sulphate at a concentration of 1000 mg/L acts as a purgative in normal humans, but concentrations below this are apparently physiologically harmless to the general population.Footnote 8,Footnote 50 It is reported that humans can adapt to higher concentrations with time.Footnote 51 Dehydration has also been reported as a common side effect following the ingestion of large amounts of magnesium or sodium sulphate.Footnote 52

In short-term (28-day) studies, weanling pigs drinking water containing sulphates at 3000 mg/L experienced no adverse effects other than diarrhoea.Footnote 53Cattle can tolerate concentrations of sodium sulphate in their drinking water up to 2610 ppm (corresponding to 527 mg/kg bw per day) for periods up to 90 days with no signs of toxicity except for changes in methaemo-globin and sulphaemoglobin levels.Footnote 54 However, 69 of 200 yearling calves, 22 of which subsequently died, developed polioencephalomalacia following ingestion of a protein supplement containing 1.5% organic sulphate and drinking water containing 1814 ppm sulphate.Footnote 55

Other Considerations

The taste threshold concentrations for the most prevalent sulphate salts are 250 to 500 mg/L (median 350 mg/L) for sodium sulphate, 250 to 900 mg/L (median 525 mg/L) for calcium sulphate and 400 to 600 mg/L (median 525 mg/L) for magnesium sulphate.Footnote 35 Concentrations of sulphate salts at which 50% of panel members considered the water to have an "offensive taste" were approximately 1000 and 850 mg/L for calcium and magnesium sulphate, respectively.Footnote 56

Sulphates can interfere with disinfection efficiency by scavenging residual chlorine in the distribution system.Footnote 57 The presence of sulphate salts in drinking water could increase corrosion of mild steel in the delivery system.Footnote 58 Sulphate-reducing bacteria may be involved in the tuberculation of metal pipes. The hydrogen sulphide produced by these bacteria may lower the aesthetic quality of the water by imparting an unpleasant taste and odour and may increase corrosion in both metal and concrete pipes.Footnote 59,Footnote 60

Rationale

  1. The major physiological effects resulting from the ingestion of large quantities of sulphate are catharsis and gastrointestinal irritation. Water containing magnesium sulphate at levels above 1000 mg/L acts as a purgative in adults. Lower concentrations may affect bottle-fed infants and adults who have just been introduced to the water.
  2. The presence of sulphate in drinking water can also result in a noticeable taste. Taste threshold concentrations for various sulphate salts appear to be at or above 500 mg/L for the general population, although sensitive individuals may find the taste objectionable at lower sulphate concentrations.
  3.  The aesthetic objective for sulphate is therefore ≤500 mg/L. Because of the possibility of adverse physiological effects at higher concentrations, it is also recommended that health authorities be notified of sources of drinking water that contain sulphate concentrations in excess of 500 mg/L.

References

Footnotes

Footnote 1

Greenwood, N.N. and Earnshaw, A. Chemistry of the elements. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK (1984).

Return to footnote 1 referrer

Footnote 2

Peck, H.D., Jr. Sulphur requirements and metabolism of micro-organisms. In: Proceedings of a Symposium on Sulphur in Nutrition. D.H. Muth and J.E. Oldfield (eds.). Ari Publishing Co., Westport, CT (1970).

Return to footnote 2 referrer

Footnote 3

Smith, R.L. Ecology and field biology. 2nd edition. Harper & Row, New York, NY (1974).

Return to footnote 3 referrer

Footnote 4

Barry, G.S. Sodium sulphate. In: Canadian minerals yearbook --1988. Mineral Report No. 37, Mineral Resources Branch, Energy, Mines and Resources Canada, Ottawa (1989).

Return to footnote 4 referrer

Footnote 5

McGuire, M.J., Jones, R.M., Means, E.G., Izaguirre, G. and Preston, A.E. Controlling attached blue-green algae with copper sulphate. J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 76(5): 60 (1984).

Return to footnote 5 referrer

Footnote 6

Kalbe, L. and Labor, V. [Odour and taste in drinking water -- a literature review of the technology of water preparation.] Wiss. Z., Wilhelm-Pieck-Univ., Rostock, 34: 60 (1985) [in German].

Return to footnote 6 referrer

Footnote 7

Delisle, C.E. and Schmidt, J.W. The effects of sulphur on water and aquatic life in Canada. In: Sulphur and its inorganic derivatives in the Canadian environment. NRCC No. 15015, Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa (1977).

Return to footnote 7 referrer

Footnote 8

McKee, J.E. and Wolf, H.W. Water quality criteria. 2nd edition. California State Water Quality Control Board, Sacramento, CA (1963).

Return to footnote 8 referrer

Footnote 9

Keller, W. and Pitblade, J.R. Water quality changes in Sudbury area lakes: a comparison of synoptic surveys in 1974-1976 and 1981-1983. Water Air Soil Pollut., 29: 285 (1986).

Return to footnote 9 referrer

Footnote 10

Klemm, R.F. and Gray, J.M.L. A study of the chemical composition of particulate matter and aerosols over Edmonton. Report No. RMD 82/9, prepared for the Research Management Division by the Alberta Research Council (1982).

Return to footnote 10 referrer

Footnote 11

Van Loon, J.C. Toronto's precipitation analyzed for heavy metal content. Water Pollut. Control, 111(2): 38 (1973).

Return to footnote 11 referrer

Footnote 12

Kelso, J.R.M., Minns, C.K., Lipsit, J.H. and Jeffries, D.S. Headwater lake chemistry during the spring freshet in north-central Ontario. Water Air Soil Pollut., 29: 245 (1986).

Return to footnote 12 referrer

Footnote 13

Katz, M. The Canadian sulphur problem. In: Sulphur and its inorganic derivatives in the Canadian environment. NRCC No. 15015, Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa. p. 21 (1977).

Return to footnote 13 referrer

Footnote 14

Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Drinking water monitoring data (unpublished). Toronto (1987).

Return to footnote 14 referrer

Footnote 15

Environment Canada. Detailed surface water quality data, Northwest Territories 1980-1981, Alberta 1980-1981, Saskatchewan 1980-1981, Manitoba 1980-1981. Unpublished results provided by Inland Waters Directorate, Ottawa (1984).

Return to footnote 15 referrer

Footnote 16

Nova Scotia Department of Public Health. Chemical quality of municipal water supplies for 1975-1976 (unpublished). Halifax (1977).

Return to footnote 16 referrer

Footnote 17

Saskatchewan Department of the Environment. Drinking water monitoring data (unpublished). Regina (1977).

Return to footnote 17 referrer

Footnote 18

Alberta Department of Environment. Summary of water chemical analysis (unpublished). Edmonton (1977).

Return to footnote 18 referrer

Footnote 19

Saskatchewan Environment and Public Safety. Water quality monitoring data -- 1970 to October 1989 (unpublished),Regina (1989).

Return to footnote 19 referrer

Footnote 20

Nova Scotia Department of Public Health. Chemical analysis of municipal water supplies -- datafile printout, 1987-1988 (unpublished). Public Health Inspection, Halifax (1988).

Return to footnote 20 referrer

Footnote 21

Nova Scotia Department of Health and Fitness. Water quality analysis in Nova Scotia municipal water supplies -- heavy metal survey, May 1989. Halifax (1990).

Return to footnote 21 referrer

Footnote 22

Hitchcock, D.R. Biogenic contributions to atmospheric sulphate levels. Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Complete Water Re-use. American Institute of Chemical Engineers and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, IL, May. p. 291 (1975).

Return to footnote 22 referrer

Footnote 23

Franklin, C.A., Burnett, R.T., Paolini, R.J.P. and Raizenne, M.E. Health risks from acid rain: a Canadian perspective. Environ. Health Perspect., 63: 155 (1985).

Return to footnote 23 referrer

Footnote 24

Ontario Ministry of the Environment. Appendix to: Annual report on air quality in Ontario. Air Quality Assessment Unit, Etobicoke (1987).

Return to footnote 24 referrer

Footnote 25

Environment Canada. PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations at Canadian sites: 1984-1993. Report No. PMD 94-3, Pollution Measurement Division (1994).

Return to footnote 25 referrer

Footnote 26

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Computer printout for frequency distribution listings for sulfate in air, 1977-1983. Provided by Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, NC (1984).

Return to footnote 26 referrer

Footnote 27

Department of National Health and Welfare. Food additive pocket dictionary. Ottawa (1987).

Return to footnote 27 referrer

Footnote 28

Hanssen, M. E for additives. Thorsons Publishing Group, Wellingborough, UK (1987).

Return to footnote 28 referrer

Footnote 29

Thienes, C.H. and Haley, T.J. Clinical toxicology. 5th edition. Lea and Fegiger, Philadelphia, PA. p. 56 (1972).

Return to footnote 29 referrer

Footnote 30

Informatics, Inc. GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) food ingredients: ammonium ion. National Technical Information Service Report No. PB-221-235, U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. p. 52 (1973).

Return to footnote 30 referrer

Footnote 31

Subcommittee on Research of GRAS List (Phase II). GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) food ingredients. DHEW No. FDA 70-22, Committee on Food Protection, Division of Biology and Agriculture, National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Washington, DC (1972).

Return to footnote 31 referrer

Footnote 32

International Commission on Radiological Protection. Report No. 23: Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK (1984).

Return to footnote 32 referrer

Footnote 33

American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Pollution Control Federation. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 16th edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC (1985).

Return to footnote 33 referrer

Footnote 34

Health Canada. Guidelines for Canadian drinking water quality --Water treatment principles and applications. A manual for the production of drinking water. Environmental Health Directorate, Health Protection Branch, Ottawa (1993).

Return to footnote 34 referrer

Footnote 35

National Academy of Sciences. Drinking water and health. National Research Council, Washington, DC (1977).

Return to footnote 35 referrer

Footnote 36

Morris, M.E. and Levy, G. Absorption of sulphate from orally administered magnesium sulphate in man. J. Toxicol. Clin. Toxicol., 20:107 (1983).

Return to footnote 36 referrer

Footnote 37

Cocchetto, D.M. and Levy, G. Absorption of orally administered sodium sulfate in humans. J. Pharm. Sci., 70: 331 (1981).

Return to footnote 37 referrer

Footnote 38

Whiting, S.J. and Cole, D.E. Effect of dietary anion composition on acid-induced hypercalciuria in the adult rat. J. Nutr., 116: 388 (1986).

Return to footnote 38 referrer

Footnote 39

Dziewiatkowski, D.D. Isolation of chondroitin sulphate-35S from articular cartilage of rats. J. Biol. Chem., 189: 187 (1951).

Return to footnote 39 referrer

Footnote 40

Dziewiatkowski, D.D. Intracellular synthesis of chondroitin sulphate. J. Cell Biol., 13: 359 (1962).

Return to footnote 40 referrer

Footnote 41

Dziewiatkowski, D.D. Sulphur in animal nutrition. In: Proceedings of a Symposium on Sulphur in Nutrition. D.H. Muth and J.E. Oldfield (eds.). Ari Publishing Co., Westport, CT (1970).

Return to footnote 41 referrer

Footnote 42

Bauer, J.H. Oral administration of radioactive sulphate to measure extracellular fluid space in man. J. Appl. Physiol., 40: 1976 (1976).

Return to footnote 42 referrer

Footnote 43

Laidlaw, J.C. and Young, L. A study of ethereal sulphate formation in vitro using radioactive sulphate. Biochem. J., 54: 142 (1953).

Return to footnote 43 referrer

Footnote 44

Bird, P.R. Sulphur metabolism and excretion studies in ruminants. Secretion of sulphur and nitrogen in sheep pancreatic and bile fluids. Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 25: 817 (1972).

Return to footnote 44 referrer

Footnote 45

Mulder, G.J. and Kevlemans, K. The metabolism of inorganic sulphate in the isolated perfused rat liver. Effect of sulphate concentration on the rate of sulphation by phenolsulphotransferase. Biochem. J., 176: 959 (1978).

Return to footnote 45 referrer

Footnote 46

Murer, H. Transport of sulfate and phosphate in small intestine and renal proximal tubule: methods and basic properties. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 90A: 749 (1988).

Return to footnote 46 referrer

Footnote 47

Krijgsheld, K.R., Frankena, H., Scholtens, E., Zweens, J. and Mulder, G.J. Absorption, serum levels and urinary excretion of inorganic sulfate after oral administration of sodium sulfate in the conscious rat. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 586: 492 (1979).

Return to footnote 48 referrer

Footnote 48

Diem, K. (ed.). Documenta Geigy scientific tables. 6th edition. J.R. Geigy S.A., Basle, Switzerland. 533 pp. (1972).

Return to footnote 48 referrer

Footnote 49

Mulder, G.J. (ed.). Sulphation of drugs and related compounds. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (1981).

Return to footnote 49 referrer

Footnote 50

Arthur D. Little, Inc. Water quality criteria data book. Vol. 2. Inorganic chemical pollution of freshwater. Water Pollut. Control Res. Ser. No. DPV 18010, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (1971).

Return to footnote 50 referrer

Footnote 51

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. National primary drinking water regulations: synthetic organic chemicals, inorganic chemicals and microorganisms; proposed rule. Fed. Regist., 50(219): 46936 (1985).

Return to footnote 51 referrer

Footnote 52

Fingl, E. Laxatives and cathartics. In: Pharmacological basis of therapeutics. A.G. Gilman, L.S. Goodman and L. Gilman (eds.). McMillan Publishing Co., New York, NY (1980).

Return to footnote 52 referrer

Footnote 53

Paterson, D.W., Wahlstrom, R.C., Libal, G.W. and Olson, O.E. Effects of sulfate in water on swine reproduction and young pig performance. J. Anim. Sci., 49(3): 664 (1979).

Return to footnote 53 referrer

Footnote 54

Digesti, R.D. and Weeth, H.J. A defensible maximum for inorganic sulfate in drinking water of cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 42: 1498 (1976).

Return to footnote 54 referrer

Footnote 55

Hibbs, C.M. and Thilsted, J.P. Toxicosis in cattle from contaminated well water. Vet. Hum. Toxicol., 25: 253 (1983).

Return to footnote 55 referrer

Footnote 56

Zoeteman, B.C.J. Sensory assessment of water quality. Pergamon Press, New York, NY (1980).

Return to footnote 56 referrer

Footnote 57

Faust, S.D. and Osman, A. Chemistry of water treatment. Butterworth Publishers, Woburn, MA (1983).

Return to footnote 57 referrer

Footnote 58

Larson, T.E. Corrosion phenomena -- causes and cures. In: Water quality and treatment. A handbook of public water supplies. 3rd edition. McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., New York, NY (1971).

Return to footnote 58 referrer

Footnote 59

National Research Council of Canada. Hydrogen sulfide in the atmospheric environment. Scientific criteria for assessing its effects on environmental quality. NRCC No. 18467, Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality, Ottawa (1981).

Return to footnote 59 referrer

Footnote 60

Hawthorn, J.E. Hydrogen sulfide damage to concrete pipe. J.Water Pollut. Control Fed., 42: 425 (1970).

Return to footnote 60 referrer