June 29, 1998
Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
This report summarizes the test results obtained by NSF International (NSF) on Drinking Water Treatment Units (DWTU) over the past five years, and itemizes and summarizes test failures and the resolution of those failures. NSF only has information on products for which the manufacturer has requested certification under one or more of the following Standards:
Formulation requirements are detailed in ANSI/NSF Standard 53, Section 4 (see Appendix I). These and all the material requirements which follow consistently appear in all six ANSI/NSF DWTU Standards. Complete formulation information is required for any material contacting potable water. It is desirable to have this information prior to extraction testing, and required prior to Certification. There are some materials, such as non-brass materials containing lead, which are rejected on the basis of formulation regardless of the test results. In general, material must meet one or more of the following criteria:
All DWTU undergo extraction testing to verify that the materials of construction of the units do not contribute unacceptable levels of contaminants to the drinking water. The only exceptions are units which are made of all Certified material and are assembled in a manner that does not introduce new contaminants, provided any surface-area-to-volume limitation for each Certified material is met and that there are no concerns regarding the cumulative levels of contaminants from the selected materials.
Test requirements are also detailed in ANSI/NSF 53 (see Section 4.3 attached as Appendix I), and include the composition of the exposure water as well as exposure time and temperature. The exposure protocol is a three-exposure sequence. Generally, the entire DWTU is tested by following the manufacturer's flushing instructions and then filling the units with exposure water at an initial inlet static pressure of 340 kPa, and capped for a 24-hour static exposure period. Three 24-hour static exposures are composited for analysis of contaminants.
Note that exposures can be done with media, without media, or both. New units with adsorptive media are tested with and without media, to detect contaminants from the media and from the materials of construction of the housing, cap and associated plumbing. A previously-tested unit for which a change in media has been requested would be tested only with media, and a previously tested unit for which a change in housing material has been requested would be tested only without media.
The required extraction testing parameters are specified in Table 1 of ANSI/NSF 53 which are attached as Appendix II. These include the metals and volatile organic chemicals regulated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), as well as some additional unregulated metals (aluminum, nickel, and manganese), and some screening parameters such as total organic carbon, and Phenolics. Table 2 of ANSI/NSF 53, attatched as Appendix III, lists parameters which are only selected if the formulation information indicates that they could leach out of the unit. Other formulation-dependent parameters may be selected if they could present a health effects concern.
During this product review period, there were 201 single-exposure tests (with or without media), and there were 98 double exposure tests (with and without media). Of those tests, there were 158 product failures, and a total of 214 parameter failures as there was more than one parameter failure in some of the tests. In cases where an extraction result indicates the unit is seriously contaminated with a compound of toxicological significance, such as a high level of Acrylonitrile or Lead, other compounds of toxicological significance, such as Cadmium or Styrene, may be included in the failure notice even though the actual level of extraction for that compound is less than the normal action level. This is done to ensure the client is aware of other potential problems in their product.
Table 1 itemizes the failed parameters, the number of times they have been involved with initial failures as well as the number of times a second or third failure has occurred involving that parameter. Table 2 itemizes the highest and lowest levels identified in a failure.
The Graphs represent the failures shown as initial failures in Table 1 where a graphical presentation is shown for each class of compounds. Graph 1 represents Inorganic Parameters, Graph 2 the Semivolatile Parameters, and Graph 3 the Volatile Parameters.
The Appendices are the referenced sections from Standard 53.
| Parameters | Initial Failures | Retest Failures | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Inorganic Parameters |
Units |
Percent* |
Units |
Percent* |
| # | % | # | % | |
| Aluminum | 6 | 2 | 1 | 0.3 |
| Antimony | 15 | 5 | 4 | 1.3 |
| Arsenic | 2 | 0.7 | ||
| Barium | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Cadmium | 2 | 0.7 | ||
| Lead | 11 | 3.7 | 2 | 0.7 |
| Manganese | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1.3 |
| Nickel | 2 | 0.7 | ||
| Phenolics | 7 | 2.3 | 3 | 1 |
| TKN | 5 | 1.7 | 3 | 1 |
| Total Dissolved Solids | 3 | 1 | ||
| Zinc | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Semivolatile Parameters | # | %* | # | %* |
| 1,4-Dioxane | 2 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7 |
| 2-Ethyl hexanol | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| 2-Phenyl-2-propanol | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Acrylonitrile | 13 | 4.4 | 2 | 0.7 |
| Aniline | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Bis-2-ethylhexyl phthalate | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Dimethyl phthalate | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Di-n-butyl phthalate | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Melamine | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone | 2 | 0.7 | 1 | 0.3 |
| Thiourea | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Total Organic Carbon (TOC) | 6.3 | 21.1 | 19 | 6.4 |
| Triphenyl phosphine oxide | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Unknown Hydrocarbon | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Volatile Parameters | # | %* | # | %* |
| 1,2, Dichloroethane | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| 1,2, Dichloropropane | 3 | 1 | ||
| Acetone | 2 | 0.7 | 2 | 0.7 |
| Benzene | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Carbon disulfide | 7 | 2.3 | 2 | 0.7 |
| Chloroform | 5 | 1.7 | 2 | 0.7 |
| Chloromethane | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Cyclohexanone | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1.3 |
| Dimethyl formamide | 10 | 3.3 | ||
| Formaldehyde | 21 | 7 | 4 | 1.3 |
| Methanol | 6 | 2 | 2 | 0.7 |
| Methylene chloride | 4 | 1.3 | 2 | 1 |
| Methylethyl ketone | 12 | 4 | 10 | 3 |
| Methyl-t-butyl ether | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Styrene | 2 | 0.7 | ||
| Tetrahydrofuran | 7 | 2.3 | 5 | 1.7 |
| Toluene | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 1 | 0.3 | ||
| Parameters | ||
|---|---|---|
| Inorganic Parameters | Highest Level | Lowest Level |
| Aluminum | 29 000 | 0.280 |
| Antimony | 14 | 7.4 |
| Arsenic | 100 | 57 |
| Barium | 220 | * |
| Cadmium | 18 | 6.4 |
| Lead | 410 | 11 |
| Manganese | 260 | 65 |
| Nickel | 540 | 190 |
| Phenolics | 930 | 52 |
| TKN | 15 mg/L | 0.5 mg/L |
| Total Dissolved Solids | 300 mg/L | 17 mg/L |
| Zinc | 7 900 | * |
| Semivolatile Parameters | ||
| 1,4-Dioxane | 120 | 14 |
| 2-Ethyl hexanol | 84 | * |
| 2-Phenyl-2-propanol | 68 | * |
| Acrylonitrile | 100 | 5 |
| Aniline | 1.3 | * |
| Bis-2-ethylhexyl phthalate | 120 | 14 |
| Dimethyl phthalate | 2 000 | * |
| Di-n-butyl phthalate | 16 | * |
| Melamine | 160 | * |
| N-Methyl-2-pyrrolidone | 380 000 | 20 |
| Thiourea | 3 | * |
| Total Organic Carbon (TOC) | 540 mg/L | 1.4 mg/L |
| Triphenyl phosphine oxide | 3 | * |
| Unknown Hydrocarbon | 2 000 | * |
| Volatile Parameters | ||
| 1,2, Dichloroethane | 28 | * |
| 1,2, Dichloropropane | 59 | 8.5 |
| Acetone | 92 | 74 |
| Benzene | 0.5 | * |
| Carbon disulfide | 1 300 | 55 |
| Chloroform | 140 | 7.1 |
| Chloromethane | 0.6 | * |
| Cyclohexanone | 2 500 | 70 |
| Dimethyl formamide | 1 300 | 10 |
| Formaldehyde | 6 300 | 120 |
| Methanol | 7 300 | 87 |
| Methylene chloride | 120 | 13 |
| Methylethyl ketone | 2 400 | 67 |
| Methyl-t-butyl ether | >1 | * |
| Styrene | 3 | 0.8 |
| Tetrahydrofuran | 3 100 | 60 |
| Toluene | 28 | * |
| 1,1,1-Trichloroethane | 25 | * |



Materials in contact with drinking water shall not impart levels of extractable contaminants that exceed the MDWLs specified in tables 1 and 2 when evaluated and tested in accordance with 4.3.
4.1.1 Complete formulation information on any material not certified as specifically compliant with the sections of the US Code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, listed in table 3, shall be reviewed to determine whether the material presents a health effects concern in contact with drinking water and to assess the material's potential for contributing contaminants to the drinking water.
NOTE - As a minimum for those materials requiring submission of formulation information, the complete chemical identity or proportion by weight (in some cases approximate weights or proportions may suffice), ingredient sources of supply, documentation regarding the health effects concern of each ingredient in the material, and documentation regarding the suitability of each ingredient for use in potable-water-contact material shall be provided.
4.1.2 If the level of an extractable contaminant exceeds the GMP level in tables 1 or 2, the manufacturing practices shall be reviewed to determine if reasonable means exist to further reduce or eliminate the contaminant.
NOTES - When an extractable contaminant has a GMP level set below the MDWL or health effects concern level, and the first exposure result is below the MDWL, the test exposure sequence in 4.3.3.2 may be repeated three times to determine if, at the end of the third exposure sequence, the concentration of the extractable contaminant is reduced to a level less than or equal to the GMP level. If all reasonable corrective actions are taken and the system does not impart a level of extractable contaminant that exceeds the GMP level at the end of the third exposure sequence, the system shall be considered to meet the requirements of this Standard.
If the GMP level is exceeded at the end of the third exposure sequence, all reasonable corrective actions are taken, and the MDWL or health effects concern level is not exceeded, the system may be considered to meet the requirements of this Standard.
4.1.3 Whole-system extraction testing may be waived if components, when separately tested, meet the requirements of this Standard and are assembled in a manner that does not introduce any new components, increase the surface area-to-volume ratio of previously evaluated components, or present potential concern based on cumulative factors.
Materials shall be tested in accordance with 4.3 to verify suitable temperature resistance.
All analyses shall be conducted in accordance with the applicable method(s) referenced in 2.
Systems and components shall be exposed to locally available tap water that has been adjusted to contain 50 mg/L ± 5 mg/L total dissolved solids, 0.5 mg/L ± 0.05 mg/L free available chlorine, and to have a pH of 6.75 ± .25.
4.3.2.1 Exposure water used to evaluate systems or components designed for exclusive application on cold water lines shall be 23°C ± 2°C (73°F ± 3°F).
4.3.2.2 Exposure water used to evaluate systems or components designed for exclusive application on hot water applications shall be 82°C ± 5°C (180°F ± 10°F).
4.3.2.3 Exposure water used to evaluate systems or components that may be subjected to occasional short-term hot water exposure shall be 74°C ± 5°C (165°F ± 10°F).
4.3.3.1 The system or component(s) of a system shall be installed, flushed, and conditioned in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions using the exposure water specified in 4.3.2 and an initial inlet static pressure of 340 kPa (50 psig).
4.3.3.2 The system or component(s) shall be refilled with exposure water specified in 4.3.2 and maintained for 24 hours at a temperature of 23°C ± 2°C (73°F ± 3°F). A two liter water sample shall then be collected. The system or component(s) shall be flushed according to the manufacturer's instructions, refilled, and maintained for 24 hours at a temperature of 23°C ± 2°C (73°F ± 3°F). A two liter water sample shall be collected. The system or component(s) shall again be flushed according to the manufacturer's instructions, refilled, and maintained for 24 hours at a temperature of of 23°C ± 2°C (73°F ± 3°F). A two liter water sample shall be collected.
NOTE - Sufficient systems or components shall be exposed to provide the required volume of extractant water.
4.3.3.3 All samples collected shall be composited and analyzed in accordance with 4.1.
4.3.3.4 Systems with adsorptive or absorptive media shall be tested with and without the media.
| Parameter | Maximum drinking water level (MDWL) mg/L |
Good manufacturing practice (GMP)1 concentration mg/L |
USEPA method(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| aluminum | 0.5 | 0.05 - 0.22 | 200.7, 200.8 |
| antimony | 0.006 | -- | 200.8, 200.9, 204.2 |
| arsenic | 0.05 | -- | 200.8, 200.9, 206.2 |
| barium | 2 | 0.05 | 200.7, 200.8 |
| beryllium | 0.004 | -- | 200.7, 200.8, 200.9, or 210.2 |
| cadmium | 0.005 | -- | 200.8, 200.9, 213.2 |
| chromium | 0.1 | -- | 200.8, 200.9, 218.2 |
| copper | 1.3 | 0.05 | 200.7, 200.8 |
| lead | 0.015 | 0.005 | 200.8, 200.9, 239.2 |
| manganese | -- | 0.05 | 200.7, 200.8 |
| mercury | 0.002 | -- | 245.1 |
| nickel | -- | 0.05 | 200.7, 200.8 |
| selenium | 0.05 | -- | 200.8, 200.9, 270.2 |
| thallium | 0.002 | -- | 200.8, 200.9, 279.2 |
| phenolics | -- | 0.05 | 420.4 |
| Total Organic Carbon (TOC) | -- | 1 | 415.2 |
| Volatile organic compounds3 | |||
| total | -- | 0.01 | 502.2 |
| benzene | 0.005 | detected | 502.2 |
| carbon disulfide | -- | 0.05 | GC/PID |
| carbon tetrachloride | 0.005 | -- | 502.2 |
| 1,2-dichloroethane | 0.005 | -- | 502.2 |
| 1,1-dichloroethylene | 0.007 | -- | 502.2 |
| dichloromethane | 0.005 | -- | 502.2 |
| 1,2-dichloropropane | 0.005 | -- | 502.2 |
| ethylbenzene | 0.7 | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| monochlorobenzene | 0.1 | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| styrene | 0.1 | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| tetrachloroethylene | 0.005 | -- | 502.2 |
| toluene | 1 | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| total trihalomethanes | 0.1 | -- | 502.2 |
| bromodichloromethane | -- | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| bromoform | -- | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| chlorodibromomethane | -- | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| chloroform | -- | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| 1,1,1-trichloroethane | 0.2 | 0.005 | 502.2 |
| 1,1,2-trichloroethane | 0.005 | -- | 502.2 |
| trichloroethylene | 0.005 | -- | 502.2 |
| vinyl chloride | 0.002 | detected | 502.2 |
| o-,m-,p-xylene | 10 | 0.005 | 502.2 |
1 Good manufacturing practice levels are set at concentrations that should be obtainable using good manufacturing practices and at levels that are reasonably quantifiable.
2 Based on the final USEPA Secondary Maximum Contaminant Level published in 56FR3573. The high level of 0.2 mg/L is shown to allow for products such as activated aluminum media.
3 The referenced method includes approximately 60 chemicals. Testing for the chemicals as specifically listed is required. Others, if detected, shall be treated as having a 0.005 mg/L Good Manufacturing Practice Level. A Good Manufacturing Practice Level of 0.010 mg/L applies to total organic compounds.
| Parameter | Maximum drinking water level (MDWL) mg/L | Good manufacturing practice (GMP)1 concentration mg/L |
USEPA method(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| total dissolved solids (TDS) | -- | 50 | 160.1 |
| total kjeldahl nitrogen | -- | 0.5 | 351.4 |
| tin | -- | 0.05 | 200.9 |
| zinc | -- | 5 | 200.7 |
| nitrate (as N) | 10 | 1 | 300 |
| nitrite (as N) | 1 | 0.1 | 300 |
| nitrate plus nitrite (as N) | 10 | 1 | |
| sulfate | -- | 40 | 300 |
| sulfite | -- | 0.5 | 377.1 |
| acrylonitrile | -- | 0.005 | GC/MS2 |
| 1,4-dioxane | -- | 0.005 | GC/MS2 |
| formaldehyde | -- | 0.5 | |
| di-2-ethylhexyl adipate | 0.4 | 525.2 | |
| phthalate scan (includes): |
|||
| butyl benzyl phthalate | 0.1 | 0.01 | 525.2 |
| di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate | 0.006 | ||
| di-n-butyl phthalate | -- | 0.01 | |
| di-n-butyl phthalate | -- | 0.01 | |
| diethyl phthalate | -- | 0.01 | |
| diethyl phthalate | -- | 0.01 | |
| polynuclear aromatics (includes): | |||
| naphthalene | -- | 0.001 | 550.1 |
| acenaphthylene | -- | 0.002 | |
| acenaphthene | -- | 0.001 | |
| fluorene | -- | 0.0002 | |
| phenanthrene | -- | 0.0001 | |
| anthracene | -- | 0.0001 | |
| fluoranthene | -- | 0.0002 | |
| pyrene | -- | 0.0001 | |
| benzo(a)anthracene | -- | 0.0001 | |
| chrysene | -- | 0.0002 | |
| benzo(b)fluoranthene | -- | 0.0002 | |
| benzo(k)fluoranthene | -- | 0.0002 | |
| benzo(a)pyrene | 0.0002 | -- | |
| dibenzo(a,h)anthracene | -- | 0.0003 | |
| benzo(g,h,i)perylene | -- | 0.0002 | |
| indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene | -- | 0.0004 | |
| nitrosamines (includes): |
|||
| n-nitroso-di-n-butyl amine | -- | 0.001 (detected) |
625 |
| n-nitrosodimethylamine | -- | 0.001 (detected) |
|
| n-nitrosodiphenylamine | -- | 0.001 (detected) |
|
| n-nitroso-di-n-propylamine | -- | 0.001 (detected) |
|
| acetone | -- | 0.05 | GC/FID or PID3 |
| cyclohexanone | -- | 0.05 | GC/FID or PID3 |
| methyl ethyl ketone | -- | 0.05 | 502.2 |
| methanol | -- | 0.05 | GC/FID |
| tetrahydrofuran | -- | 0.05 | GC/FID or PID3 |
1 Good manufacturing practice levels are set at concentrations that should be obtainable using good manufacturing practices and at levels that are reasonably quantifiable.
2 Gas chromatography with mass spectrometry.
3 Gas chromatography, with detection by flame ionization or photoionization.
NOTE B Formulation-dependent extraction testing parameters, not listed in this Table shall have a corresponding MDWL established in accordance with the procedures in ANSI/NSF 61, Drinking Water System Components - Health Effects, Appendix A.