Return to the Factsheet Listing
Objective: To outline trends in consumer knowledge, attitudes and behaviour related to consumer food choices and the use of nutrition labels.
Health and nutrition information is widely available to consumers, and creates a context for using food labels. Food labels are a valuable source of product-specific nutrition information at the point-of-purchase - a tool to help consumers make food choices consistent with their dietary goals.
But information alone does not change behaviour; consumer motivations, concerns and barriers are also critical factors. Consumers use nutrition information on food labels in many different ways. Effective education starts from the consumers' perspective.
Nutrition information on food labels plays an important role in purchase decisions for almost three-quarters of Canadians.1,2 Almost all (93%) want to see such information provided on all or most foods.1 However, consumers have varied skills in finding sought-after information, and understanding and relating it to their nutrition decisions. Insights can be gained from studies that report on the use and understanding of nutrition labelling prior to the legislation that made it mandatory.
Current labelling regulations and education attempt to address the difficulties and barriers that consumers faced in the past.
The introduction of a mandatory, consistent nutrition label in the United States in 1994 offers an opportunity to foresee the potential of Canada's new label. The US label appears to be having an impact on Americans' food purchase decisions.7-10
Nutrition Facts is a tool that can help consumers make more informed choices. Educators can help consumers better use the information on food labels to meet their needs.
Nutrition and health are top concerns for almost 90% of Canadians when they make food and eating decisions - with only taste ranking higher.12 Three-quarters (73%) say they choose or avoid certain foods because they are concerned about their health.13 And their concerns about what is in food have risen over the last decade.3
Canadians report making changes in their buying and eating practices.
Only 38% of Canadians rate their diets as very good or excellent,3 and the eating patterns of many still contribute to the high incidence of nutrition-related chronic diseases.
In 2001, more than two-thirds expressed some concern about:
fat, vitamins, saturated fat, fibre, protein, calcium, cholesterol, calories/energy, sugar, salt/sodium, carbohydrates and iron.
- all of those concerns are addressed through the Nutrition Facts, as core nutrients.
Integrating nutrition labelling education into healthy eating programs will put the label information into a broader context.
Food purchase decisions involve a complex process: choosing among new products, old favourites and treats; balancing nutrition, taste, time, convenience, variety and price. The task is especially difficult while hungry or in a hurry, and without advance planning for shopping or meals. Canadians need to be able to make quick and informed decisions in the store to ensure that they have healthy choices on hand.
Time pressures on families can translate into increased consumption of prepared foods and restaurant meals. Large portion sizes and marketing of prepared and convenience foods can influence food choices and eating patterns.
Canadians are looking for clear guidance on food choices and over half are tired of conflicting messages and complex information.12
The four key nutrition labelling messages are designed to make consumers aware of the nutrition information on food labels and draw attention to two important elements of the Nutrition Facts table - serving size and % Daily Value (% DV). These messages are starting points for introducing the nutrition information on food labels and can be used to provide consistent messages to consumers.
1. National Institute of Nutrition: Nutrition Labelling: Perceptions and Preferences of Canadians, Ottawa, June 1999
2. National Institute of Nutrition: Tracking Nutrition Trends 1989-1994-1997, Ottawa, April 1997
3. National Institute of Nutrition: Tracking Nutrition Trends IV, Ottawa, 2002
4. National Institute of Nutrition: Nutrition Labelling Consumer Research, Ottawa, January/February, 1999
5. National Institute of Nutrition: Health Claims in Canada: Taking the Consumer Pulse, Ottawa, March 1999
6. Food and Consumer Products Manufacturers of Canada: 1996 Consumerline Survey, Toronto, 1996
7. American Dietetic Association: The American Dietetic Association 1997 Nutrition Trends Survey, Executive Summary, Chicago, 1997
8. Levy A, Derby B: The Impact of the NLEA on Consumers: Recent Findings from FDA's Food Label and Nutrition Tracking System, Food and Drug Administration, Consumer Studies Branch, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Washington, DC, 1996
9. Derby BM, Levy AS: Do food labels work? Gauging the effectiveness of food labels pre- and post-NLEA. In: Handbook of Marketing and Society. Bloom PN, Gundlach GT (eds), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 2001
10. Silverglade B: Using food labelling to improve diet and health: An examination of the U.S. Nutrition Labeling and Education Act. European Food Law Rev 97(4): 430-436
11. Neuhouser ML, Kristal AR, Patterson RE: Use of food nutrition labels is associated with lower fat intake. J Am Diet Assoc 1999; 99: 45-50, 53
12. Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research, Dietitians of Canada, Kraft Canada : Speaking of Food and Eating - A Consumer Perspective, Toronto, 1996
13. Health Canada : National Population Health Survey 1998-99, unpublished results, April 27, 2000
14. Health Canada : Canadians and Healthy Eating: How Are We Doing? Nutrition Highlights, National Population Health Survey, 1994-95, Ottawa, March 1997
15. Food and Consumer Products Manufacturers of Canada, Canadian Council of Grocery Distributors, Canadian Living, Arthur Andersen: Health, Time and Shopping: The Balancing Act. 1999 Consumerline Survey, FCPMC, Toronto, 1999
16. Statistics Canada : Family Food Expenditure in Canada, Ottawa, 1998 (Catalogue No. 62-554-XPB)