1st edition - November 2006
Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
3 Avoidable costs: the Feasible Minimum
4 Special considerations in developing countries
5 Time lags associated with policies to reduce substance abuse
6 The reliability and usefulness of avoidable cost estimates
7 Policy implications of avoidable cost estimates
Appendix A - World Health Organisation information on drug-attributable fractions
Appendix C - Estimating the social costs of drug-attributable crime
Appendix D - Evidence on the effectiveness of interventions to reduce drug- attributable crime
Appendix E - Evidence on the prevention of substance use risk and harm
Table 1 - Substance abuse cost estimates and their policy uses
Table 2 - Social costs associated with substance abuse
Table 3 - Drug-attributable diseases for which the WHO has estimated attributable fractions
Table 6 - Estimates of potentially preventable mortality in Australia
Table 7 - Adult smoking prevalence, WHO sub-region AMR-D
Table 8 - Avoidable proportions of smoking burdens, WHO sub-region AMR-D
Table 10 - The 14 epidemiological sub-regions
Table 11 - Sample of the epidemiological information presented in Ezzati et al (2004)
Table 12 - Crime-attributable fractions (prisoners), by category of crime, Australia, 2001
Table 13 - Crime-attributable fractions (police detainees) by category of crime, Australia, 2001
Table 14 - Summary: The effectiveness of childhood interventions
Table 15 - Summary: The effectiveness of interventions for young people
Table 16 - Summary of broad-based strategies
Table 17 - Summary: The effectiveness of demand reduction interventions
Table 18 - Summary: The effectiveness of law enforcement interventions for licit drugs
Table 19 - Summary: The effectiveness of law enforcement interventions for illicit drugs
Table 21 - Summary: The effectiveness of tobacco and alcohol harm reduction
Table 22 - Summary: The effectiveness of illicit drug harm reduction interventions