This content was archived on June 24, 2013.
Information identified as archived on the Web is for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It has not been altered or updated after the date of archiving. Web pages that are archived on the Web are not subject to the Government of Canada Web Standards. As per the Communications Policy of the Government of Canada, you can request alternate formats on the "Contact Us" page.
August 2005
Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
This report is produced annually by the Office of Controlled Substances (OCS) to provide stakeholders and other interested parties information on the number of commercial licences and authorizations issued under the Industrial Hemp Regulations (IHR), and research licences issued under the Narcotic Control Regulations (NCR). It also contains an overview of any policy development work and an update on the List of Approved Cultivars.
In 2005, two new cultivars were added to the List of Approved Cultivars (LOAC). Alyssa, is a monecious, female predominant, dual purpose variety developed specifically for Manitoba growers. Flowering occurs approximately sixty days after seeding. ESTA-1, is a dioecious grain variety, developed in the Ottawa valley, that flowers approximately fifty days following seeding. Both varieties grow to between 150 cm and 180 cm in height.
In April 2005, Plant Breeders' Rights for the Finola variety were assigned to Hemp Oil Canada Inc. Finola continues to demonstrate high levels of THC in some samples when tested in Health Canada laboratories. This situation is being monitored and duplicate testing of samples in both licensed, private laboratories and Health Canada laboratories is ongoing.
On March 31st 2005, the Director, Office of Controlled Substances approved the policy to exempt varieties of industrial hemp that consistently demonstrated low levels of THC in annual testing. The policy applies to varieties of Cannabis sativa L. that are listed on the LOAC, prepared and published annually by the OCS. Varieties identified on the list as being exempt from testing are exempt from the requirement under subsection 16(1) of the IHR for the current growing season only. Varietal exemption from testing will be reviewed annually by the Interdepartmental Working Group-Cultivars. In 2005, USO 14 and USO 31 have been exempted from annual testing as required under subsection 16(1) of the Industrial Hemp Regulations. These varieties have been evaluated against the Policy on the Exemption of Industrial Hemp Varieties from THC Testing During the Growing Season. A copy of this policy can be found on our website.
The objective of this draft policy is to articulate the criteria under which the Minister will designate or remove varieties of industrial hemp from the LOAC pursuant to section 39 of the IHR. Under this policy, the Interdepartmental Working Group - Cultivars will make recommendations to the Director of the OCS, regarding the varieties that should be considered for inclusion on the LOAC, those that should be removed from the list or placed under observation due to a potential to exhibit elevated THC levels. Comments on this draft policy were being accepted by the section until August 31st 2005. The approved policy will be posted on the website in the near future.
This section is to report on initiatives and developments within the industrial hemp industry that have come to our attention. For your reference, we have provided the website addresses after each section.
Commercial licences are issued for specific activities including the importation, exportation, production, sale and provision of industrial hemp. Tables 1, 2 and 3 provide information on the licences and authorizations issued for commercial activities as of July 31, 2005.The number of applicants is less than the number of licences issued. A single applicant may request licences for multiple activities at multiple locations. A licence is issued to a qualified applicant to perform specified activities at one site. A single licence number is issued for each location, even where multiple activities are approved for that site.
| LICENCE SUMMARY | TOTAL | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of APPLICANTS* | 224 | 4 | 23 | 89 | 75 | 17 | 13 | 3 | 0 |
| Number of Applicants issued licences | 218 | 39 | 22 | 87 | 74 | 17 | 12 | 3 | 0 |
| Number of APPLICATIONS** submitted for review | 468 | 14 | 42 | 146 | 203 | 46 | 14 | 3 | 1 |
| Number of LICENCES ISSUED*** | 421 | 13 | 42 | 136 | 186 | 40 | 13 | 3 | 1 |
| Number of Applications under Review | 19 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of Applications Withdrawn | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
* Applicant refers to a company, co-operative, partnership, or individual submitting a request to engage in one or more activities at one or more licensed sites
** Application refers to a request for a licence to engage in one or more activities at one site (# of licences = # of sites).
*** Licences Issued refers to a licence to engage in one or more activities at one licensed site ( # of licences = # of sites).
Since the dramatic decrease in number of hectares requested, and therefore licensed, for commercial cultivation in 2001, the number of licensed hectares has been steadily increasing, as illustrated in the chart below. Acreage and the number of licences issued for commercial cultivation both significantly increased in 2005. As of July 31, 2005, the acreage licensed for the commercial cultivation increased by 300% from that licensed in 2004. Likewise, the number of cultivation licences issued has increased by greater than 200% over 2004. Fifty per cent of the licensed hectares are located in Manitoba. No applications were received from Newfoundland and Labrador, the Northwest Territories, Nunavut, Prince Edward Island, or the Yukon.

| AUTHORIZATION SUMMARY | TOTAL | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUTHORIZATIONS Requested | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | |||||
| AUTHORIZATIONS Issued | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Sampling* | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | |||||
| Viability Testing | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| Transportation Only | |||||||||
| Possession for Other Purposes | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||
| AUTHORIZATIONS Refused | |||||||||
| AUTHORIZATIONS Withdrawn | |||||||||
| Authorization Applications under review | 1 | 1 |
* "Sampling" refers to authorizations issued for crop sampling for THC analysis, derivative sampling for THC analysis, and/or seed sampling for viability testing.
| ACTIVITY/SCHEDULE | TOTAL | BC | AB | SK | MB | ON | QC | NB | NS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHEDULE 1 (Cultivate) submitted for review | 336 | 0 | 35 | 113 | 151 | 23 | 10 | 3 | 1 |
| Licences with cultivation activity granted | 302 | 0 | 27 | 108 | 131 | 23 | 9 | 3 | 1 |
| Hectares requested | 10648.4 | 0 | 1105.1 | 3578.8 | 5596.2 | 251.2 | 80.1 | 19 | 18 |
| Hectares licensed | 9725.2 | 0 | 916 | 3428.8 | 5018.4 | 251.2 | 73.8 | 19 | 18 |
| SCHEDULE 2 (Import) submitted for review | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Licences granted | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| SCHEDULE 3 (Export) submitted for review | 17 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Licences granted | 17 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | ||
| SCHEDULE 4 (Processing) submitted for review | 45 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Licences granted | 45 | 1 | 7 | 14 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| SCHEDULE 5 (Distribution) submitted for review | 221 | 1 | 19 | 93 | 81 | 11 | 13 | 2 | 1 |
| Licences granted | 213 | 1 | 17 | 90 | 80 | 11 | 12 | 2 | 1 |
| SCHEDULE 7 (Breeder) submitted for review | 22 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 10 | ||||
| Licences granted | 16 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 10 | ||||
| SCHEDULE 8 (Viability Testing) submitted for review | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| Licences granted | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
| SCHEDULE 10 (Producing a Derivative) submitted for review | 27 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| Licences granted | 27 | 1 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 |


A diverse spectrum of research with industrial hemp continues to occur in Canada each year. The following is a sample of the types of research taking place to expand the uses of industrial hemp, increase the knowledge base with respect to its production, and increase the diversity of cultivars available:
The Narcotic Control Regulations and related policies govern the requirements for research licences. Areas of production for applications and licences that relate to greenhouse or laboratory production are not included in these figures.
| Research Licence Information | 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # applicants issued a licence | 30 | 21 | 11 | 4 | 10 | 10 |
| # licences issued | 46 | 37 | 24 | 12 | 22 | 30 |
| # cultivation licences issued | 39 | 31 | 24 | 9 | 22 | 28 |
| # hectares licensed | 65.11 | 39.71 | 27.83 | 2.00 | 5.63 | 22.66 |