Publisher Information: Publications, Health Canada
Date of Publication: November 2004
ISBN: 0-662-68551-2
Cat. No.: H39-4/56-1-2004
Help on accessing alternative formats, such as Portable Document Format (PDF), Microsoft Word and PowerPoint (PPT) files, can be obtained in the alternate format help section.
An Act respecting assisted human reproduction and related research (the Act) became law on March29, 2004. This Act governs the area of assisted human reproduction (AHR). The Act prohibits certain ethically unacceptable activities, like human cloning. In addition, it provides a mechanism to oversee acceptable activities, such as invitro fertilization (IVF), thus helping to protect the health and safety of Canadians, as well as a mechanism to oversee AHR-related research. The Act will eventually lead to the establishment of the Assisted Human Reproduction Agency of Canada, responsible for licensing, inspecting and enforcing activities controlled under the Act.
Many pieces of legislation require the support of regulations in order to be fully implemented. Like statutes, regulations have binding legal effects. A regulation must be consistent with its enabling Act and cannot go beyond the scope of the Act. Generally, regulations serve to complement and fill in the details of the policy framework set out in a statute and to establish rules and procedures that are within the scope of the statute.
The task of developing proposals for the regulations which will support the AHR Act rests with Health Canada.
Throughout the development of the AHR regulations, Health Canada plans to undertake public involvement activities to ensure that interested parties have an opportunity to present their views, concerns and recommendations. At present, consultations are planned to be held over the next three years to develop the components for the regulatory framework under the AHR Act. The consultations will be held on the following subjects:
The purpose of this paper is twofold: to inform Canadians, and to seek their views on the development of regulations concerning section 8 (consent) of the Act and concerning the definition of an invitro embryo donor. Readers may find it helpful to have a copy of the AHR Act at hand for ease of reference 1.
At the end of this document, readers will be provided with the opportunity to respond to a series of questions posed by Health Canada. The comments or recommendations that readers might wish to provide will be considered in the development of regulations for section 8 (consent) and for the definition of an invitro embryo donor. In order to develop regulations in a timely manner, please note that the deadline for receipt of comments is December 10,2004.
An Act respecting assisted human reproduction and related research (the short title is Assisted Human Reproduction Act) has three primary objectives. First, to prohibit unacceptable practices such as human cloning. Second, to protect Canadians using AHR to help build their families without compromising their health and safety. Third, to ensure that AHR related research which may facilitate treatment for infertility and certain diseases, such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson's and cancer, takes place within a regulated environment.
The Act begins with a Declaration of Principles that sets out the broad principles on which the Act and future regulations are based. For example, the health and well-being of children born through the application of AHR technologies must be given priority in decisions respecting the use of such technologies. Also, the health and well being of women in particular must be protected in the application of these technologies. The Declaration also states the need to preserve and protect human individuality and diversity, and the integrity of the human genome. Further it is declared that free and informed consent is a fundamental condition of the use of AHR technologies. As well, the Act addresses the concerns raised by the commercialization of the reproductive capabilities of women and men.
The Act helps to protect Canadians by prohibiting certain unacceptable activities from taking place in Canada, such as:
The Act establishes controlled activities that are prohibited unless carried out with a licence and in accordance with the regulations. Such controlled activities include AHR procedures like invitro fertilisation, donor insemination and research involving the human invitro embryo.
The Act will ensure that all research involving the use of a human invitro embryo is strictly regulated. First, the Act will require persons, such as researchers, to obtain the fully informed written consent of invitro embryo donors prior to using them. Second, an invitro embryo can only be used if the Agency (when established) is satisfied that it's use is necessary for the purpose of the proposed research. Third, an embryo cannot be maintained outside the body of a woman past the 14th day of development which is the internationally accepted standard. Fourth, all such research will be licensed in accordance with the forthcoming regulations.
Finally, the Act provides for the establishment of the Assisted Human Reproduction Agency of Canada (the Agency). The Agency will become a recognized and knowledgeable source of reliable information on AHR-related issues. Its responsibilities will include inspecting clinics, issuing licences, maintaining a donor/offspring registry, and providing reliable information on AHR to Canadians.
The Act creates offences for contravention of its provisions, regulations, and the terms and conditions of a licence. Contravention could result in a fine and/or imprisonment. Almost all AHR services provided by clinics fall under the category of controlled activities, which will be allowed with a licence obtained from the Agency. Once the Agency becomes operational and licences are issued, inspections of clinics will be conducted to verify that their activities are in compliance with the legislation. The Agency may use various enforcement measures, such as amendments to the terms of licences or the suspension or revocation of licences.
At the time the Act received Royal Assent (March 29, 2004) and became law, only section78 of the Act came into force. Section 78 allows the remaining provisions of the Act to come into force at various times.
Most of the prohibitions (sections 5 through 9) came into force on April22, 2004. The one exception is section 8, prohibits the use of reproductive material and the invitro embryo without consent. It will be brought into force when accompanying regulations are made.
The feedback received in response to the present document will help inform the development of these regulations.
The "controlled activities" sections (sections 10-13) and section 71 (the "grandfathering" provision) also came into force on April 22. The one exception is section12, which deals with the reimbursement of receipted expenditures.
Provisions relating to the creation of the Agency will be brought into force at a date when the selection process for the President and Board of Directors has been completed and appointments are ready to be made. This is expected in 2005. The overall regulatory and licencing schemes are expected to be in place in 2007.
As mentioned above, section 8 of the Act, which prohibits the use of reproductive material and the invitro embryo without consent, will be brought into force once the accompanying regulations have been developed.
The purpose of this document is to facilitate the informed participation of Canadians in the development of section 8 regulations. An overview of the consent issues related to the use of reproductive material is provided below. At this time, Health Canada is also interested in including Canadians in the development of a definition of an invitro embryo donor as the Act refers to regulations to define this term. This is explained below.
Aside from section 8, there are other provisions of the Act which refer to consent, though in different contexts (as explained in 3.4 below). These provisions will be dealt with in a future consultation document.
At the end of this document, readers will be provided with the opportunity to respond to a series of questions posed by Health Canada. The comments or recommendations that readers might wish to provide will be considered in the development of regulations for section 8 (consent) and the definition of an invitro embryo donor. In order to develop regulations in a timely manner, please note that the deadline for receipt of comments is December 10, 2004.
Once the comments on this document have been compiled and analysed, a regulatory proposal together with a report on the consultations will be made available. In keeping with the Federal Regulatory Policy requirements, the proposals will be drafted into regulations and the supporting Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement. The draft regulations will then be pre-published in Part I of the Canada Gazette for a public comment period. After final revisions are complete, there will be a formal publication of the regulations in Part II of the Canada Gazette.
The following terms are used in this document and defined here for clarification:
The requirement for free and informed consent is a core principle of the AHR Act. Consent is required to protect those involved in the donation and/or use of human reproductive materials and the human invitro embryo. For example, sperm, eggs and invitro embryos cannot be used unless the donors have given their consent in writing. All persons contemplating donating their human reproductive materials or invitro embryo must be fully informed, in writing, of the requirements of the Act respecting the retention, use and destruction of their reproductive material or invitro embryo.
Throughout the development of the AHR Act, informed consent has generated commentary from stakeholders (i.e. interested parties) and parliamentarians as to the importance of this principle. From the 1993 Royal Commission to the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health hearings on the proposed legislation, the importance of fully informed and freely given consent was continually underscored.
For example, it its Final Report (1993), the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies stated the following:
"Researchers conducting interviews for the Commission were told that sperm donation is not necessarily a simple isolated act; some donors said they had not considered the full implications of DI [donor insemination] until years after donating. Some said they strongly regretted donating; some felt frustrated by the lack of access to basic information about the children born as a result of their donation. Many reported that they regarded donation very casually until they were married or had children of their own, when they began considering the implications of having a genetically linked child growing up elsewhere. Some donors also reported that their wives or partners were upset by their past donations and said they worried that their children should marry a half sibling unknowingly." (p.446, vol.1)
This issue was further discussed before the House of Commons Standing Committee on Health during its review of the legislative proposals (2001). In its recommendations, theCommittee reiterated the importance of informed consent which they often associated with'choice':
Recommendation 3 (e): "the principle of free and informed choice as a fundamental condition of the use of assisted human reproduction must be promoted and applied."
The Committee also emphasized the importance of section 8:
"Without full and informed consent for any controlled activity, participating adults could face unknown long-term harm. Consent must be freely given and be based on full understanding of the implications of providing one's personal reproductive material for use by others. The Committee strongly supports this prohibition on the use of reproductive materials and embryos without consent." (p.14)
In the context of the Act, it is important to distinguish between the consent given for the use of one's own reproductive material (e.g. sperm and eggs) to create an embryo from the consent given to undergo a medical procedure. Informed consent as it relates to a medical procedure is a separate matter between physicians and their patients and is beyond the scope of the Act.
The AHR Act defines consent in broad terms, making reference to "the applicable law governing consent". Generally, for a consent to be valid in law, the person giving consent (1)must have the capacity to consent, that is, be of sound mind and of the appropriate age; and (2)must do so freely, voluntarily, without undue pressure or influence. In addition consent must be informed, that is, the person must have sufficient information in order to make an informed decision to consent to whichever procedure or action is being contemplated.
As defined in section 3 of the Act:
"consent" means fully informed and freely given consent that is given in accordance with the applicable law governing consent and that conforms to the provisions of the Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research Guidelines released by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in March, 2002, as detailed in the Regulations.
The Act deals with informed consent in a number of provisions and in different contexts. These provisions provide the basis for the consent framework of the Act. Section 8 is only one component of this framework. In order to better understand the objectives of section 8 and situate them within the larger consent framework of the Act, a brief overview of the overall consent framework is outlined here (three major areas of the Act make reference to informed consent, as shown in the chart below).
The development of a regulatory proposal in relation to section 8 of the Act is the focus of this document. In this section, consent is required to prevent the misuse of reproductive material to create an embryo or the misuse of an in vitro embryo for any purpose.

As indicated in the chart, there are other provisions of the Act which pertain to informed consent. First, sections 14 to 19 refer to consent in the context of health reporting information 2. For example, before health reporting information can be collected from an individual, there is an obligation to inform the individual in writing of the requirements of the Act and to obtain that individual's written informed consent. The Act states what type of information must be provided to obtain informed consent from an individual who donates human reproductive material or an in vitro embryo, or when an individual provides health reporting information:
s.14(2)(a): inform the person in writing of the requirements of this Act respecting, as the case may be, (i) the retention, use, provision to other persons and destruction of the human reproductive material or in vitro embryo, or (ii) the retention, use, disclosure and destruction of the health reporting information.
Second, subsection 40 (3.1) deals with consent as it applies to research and clinical trials. In this context, consent has specific meaning and the Act draws on established guidelines for consent for research involving the in vitro embryo specifically to derive stem cells - i.e.the March 2002 Canadian Institutes of Health Research's Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research Guidelines.
As this document is only intended to address section 8 and its regulatory requirements, issues pertaining to the other sections (i.e. sections 14 to 19 and subsection 40(3.1) where consent is addressed will be consulted upon at a later date.
It is important to note that as section 8 pertains to the use of human reproductive materials and in vitro embryos, it does not refer to their destruction. Issues surrounding consent to the destruction of human reproductive materials and the invitro embryo will be dealt with in later consultations pertaining to sections 14 to 19 of the Act.
Donor of Human Reproductive Material
As stated above in section 2.5, the definition of a donor includes an individual who makes use of their own reproductive material (often with a partner) with the intention of reproduction. However, it can also include an individual who provides their reproductive material to another person(s), for that person's reproductive purposes. The latter is referred to as third party donation.
Under the Act, a donor may be any individual from whose body human reproductive material was obtained, whether for their own use or for the use of others.
Given that it takes the gametes (sperm, eggs) of two individuals to create an embryo, the man and woman who have provided their gametes for reproductive purposes are known as the donors.
A donor of reproductive material could be, for example:
Donor of an In Vitro Embryo
The Act states that a donor in relation to an invitro embryo is as defined in the regulations (under the definition of "donor" in section 3). The authority to define an invitro embryo donor in the regulations is found in paragraph 65(1)(a) of the Act. For further discussion of the definition of an invitro embryo donor, please refer to item 5(3) below for proposed definitions.
The purpose of the prohibitions in section 8 are to prevent the misuse of human reproductive materials and the invitro embryo. Given that contravention of section 8 would be an offence with potentially significant penalties, it is important that the regulations relate closely to the scope and purpose of this section. For this reason, the regulations pertaining to section 8 will not deal with all of the information requirements pertaining to consent. Further requirements will be addressed in a separate set of regulations that will be developed later as part of the regulations under sections 14-19 of the Act.
In order to respect the principle of reproductive autonomy, a donor's consent is a mandatory condition of use under section 8. Only the individual donors may consent to the use of their reproductive materials and/or invitro embryo.
Section 8 reads as follows:
(1)No person shall make use of human reproductive material for the purpose of creating an embryo unless the donor of the material has given written consent, in accordance with the regulations, to its use for that purpose.
(2)No person shall remove human reproductive material from a donor's body after the donor's death for the purpose of creating an embryo unless the donor of the material has given written consent, in accordance with the regulations, to its removal for that purpose.
(3)No person shall make use of an invitro embryo for any purpose unless the donor has given written consent, in accordance with the regulations, to its use for that purpose.
Section 8 specifies three circumstances where consent must be obtained from the donor before sperm and/or eggs or an invitro embryo may be used or before sperm and/or eggs may be posthumously removed. These three circumstances are as follows:
(1) consent to the use of sperm and/or eggs to create an embryo;
(2) consent to the removal of sperm or eggs from a donor's body posthumously for the purpose of creating an embryo; and
(3) consent to the use of an invitro embryo for any purpose.
Each of these circumstances is addressed separately below. Also addressed below are the details of how section 8 regulations and the definition regarding an invitro embryo donor could be developed. Please note that in many cases, there are no policy options presented given the existence of other regulations and the constraints of the prohibitions to which these regulations will relate. Please see the chart at Annex A for a summary of the information provided below.
At the end of each of the following sections, questions relevant to that particular section are being posed. In the Questionnaire and Response form, all the questions are listed with some space to provide input.
The Act prohibits the creation of an invitro embryo for any purpose other than creating a human being or forimproving or providing instruction in assisted human reproduction procedures (paragraph5(1)(b).
Subsection 8(1) makes it an offence for a person to use a donor's human reproductive material (i.e. sperm/or eggs) for the purpose of creating an embryo unless the donor of the material has given his or her written consent to that use.
For the purpose of subsection 8(1) of the Act, there are five scenarios under which consent would be required to use human reproductive material for the purpose of creating an embryo. It is proposed that the regulations would deal with the following scenarios:
Question 1: Do you have any comments on the requirements for section 8 (consent) regulations regarding the use of human reproductive materials for the purpose of creating an embryo:
Question 2: Specifically, do you have any comments on the proposal that prior to providing a consent, a donor must be informed that his or her donation or any resulting in vitro embryo may not be used due to the presence of disease, lack of viability, or for some other reasons in which case the human reproductive material or in vitro embryo may be disposed of?
Subsection 8(2) makes it an offence for a person to remove sperm or eggs from a donor's body posthumously for the purpose of creating an embryo, unless the donor consented in writing to the removal for that purpose prior to death.
Under subsection 8(2), there are several instances for which consent would be required for the posthumous removal of sperm or eggs for the purpose of creating an embryo. Although posthumous removal of sperm or eggs is rarely requested, the requirement for obtaining consent would be to respect the wishes of the donor to provide their sperm or eggs for reproductive use. It is proposed to limit donation to the donor's partner for the partner's own reproductive use.
It is proposed that the regulations would outline the following:
Question 3: Do you have any comments on the requirements for consent regarding the removal of human reproductive materials from a donor's body posthumously for the purpose of creating an embryo for:
Question 4: Do you have any comments on the proposal that prior to providing a consent, a donor must be informed that his or her donation or any resulting in vitro embryo may not be used due to the presence of disease, lack of viability, or for some other reasons in which case the human reproductive material or in vitro embryo may be disposed of?
Subsection 8 (3) makes it an offence for a person to use an invitro embryo for any purpose unless the donor(s) of the invitro embryo has provided written consent for that use. Prior to elaborating on this, the expression "invitro embryo donor" must be defined. The Act states that the term donor in relation to an invitro embryo is as defined in the regulations (see definition of "donor" in section 3 of the Act). The authority to define the term "invitro embryo donor" in the regulations is found in paragraph 65(1)(a) of the Act.
As stated in the AHR Act's Principles in paragraph 2: (e)
This means that single individuals and same sex partners cannot be discriminated against. For this reason the definition of a donor of an in vitro embryo needs to take into consideration all of these possible scenarios.
Health Canada proposes that an "invitro embryo donor" be defined to mean:
It is proposed that there be four situations where consent would be required by the regulations for the use of an invitro embryo, as described below:
It will be important and necessary for donors who provide their supernumerary invitro embryos for third party reproductive use to understand that their consent in this context includes consent to all possible future uses, as authorized by the Act, of that invitro embryo created using their reproductive materials. Once they have donated their invitro embryo and it has been assigned to a third party, it will be up to the third party to decide how this invitro embryo will be used.
For research
In the event that a person(s) has invitro embryos in excess of their reproductive needs, these invitro embryos may be donated for research purposes. However, the invitro embryo donor must consent to the use of their invitro embryo(s) for this purpose.
In particular, if an invitro embryo is donated to research to derive stem cells, then a separate consent to that effect is required in order to conform to the March 2002 Canadian Institutes of Health Research's Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Research Guidelines as referred to in the Act (see definition of "consent" in section 3 andsubsection 40(3.1) of the Act).
Where an invitro embryo is created, it is proposed that the regulations would outline that the donors must be informed that their invitro embryo may not be used due to the presence of disease, lack of viability or some other reasons in which case the in vitro embryo may be disposed of. Donors must be informed of this possibility, before providing consent to any use of their invitro embryo.
However, they could then decide to consent to another purpose (e.g. research). In that instance, he or she may vary or withdraw his or her consent, provided that the person who has control of the in vitro embryo at the time of the withdrawal or variation of the consent is notified, in writing, of that withdrawal or variation of consent prior to the in vitro embryo being assigned to an individual or couple for their reproductive use or to a licensed researcher for research use.
In the above situations, it is important to note that where consent from two people is required, such as, for example, in the case of donation of an invitro embryo by a couple, both parties' consent would need to be compatible. This would ensure that in cases of divorce, or death, one partner could not use the invitro embryo without the matching consent of their ex-partner.
A donor may change or withdraw their consent as long as the invitro embryo has not been used for its intended purpose. However, once they have donated their invitro embryo to a third-party and the third party has provided written consent to the use of the invitro embryo, neither "original" donor could alter their consent as it would be up to the third party to decide how this invitro embryo would be used.
A fictionalized case scenario is given at Annex B to help explain the policy intent of the AHR Act that would be reflected in the regulations.
Question 5: Do you have any comments on the proposed definition of an invitro embryo donor?
Question 6: Do you have any comments on the requirements for section 8 regulations (consent) regarding the use of an invitro embryo as follows:
Question 7: Specifically, do you have any comments on the proposal that, in order to obtain informed consent, donors must be informed that:
Question 8: Do you have any comments regarding the proposed requirement for mutual consent?
And finally, these general questions:
Question 9: For those directly engaged in providing AHR services, what impact do you foresee these regulations will have on your day-to-day operations?
Question 10: Do you have any general comments you wish to share with Health Canada concerning the issues raised in this document?

This is a fictionalized case scenario to help explain the policy intent of the AHR Act that would be reflected in the regulations:
Ms. X - egg donor
Mr. Y - sperm donor
Mr. and Mrs. P - couple needing a donated in vitro embryo
Ms. X donates her eggs and consents to the creation of an embryo using her egg, for a third party reproductive use. Mr. Y donates his sperm and consents to the creation of an embryo using his sperm, for a third party reproductive use.
Both Ms. X and Mr. Y sign individual consent forms. Both donors realize that once the eggs or the gametes have been assigned to a third party for the creation of an in vitro embryo, they can no longer change or withdraw their consents.
Mr. and Mrs. P need IVF and require donated in vitro embryos. They intend to use the invitro embryos created with the gametes of Ms. X and Mr. Y.
Six invitro embryos are created for Mr. and Mrs. P and two are transferred to Mrs. P's uterus. The remaining four invitro embryos are cryopreserved for future use. Mrs. P gives birth to achild.
This chain of events follows:
-After a year, Mr. and Mrs. P seek a divorce.
-Mr. P does not want Mrs. P to use their stored embryos for IVF treatment. Mr.P withdraws his consent for Mrs.P's use of the invitro embryos.
-Mrs. P wants to use the invitro embryos for her own use but realizes she cannot without Mr. P's consent. However, Mrs. P decides that, if Mr. P consents, she would like the invitro embryos to be donated to research or donated to another couple or individual for their IVF treatment.
-Mr. P agrees to the latter and both Mr. and Mrs. P sign consent forms agreeing to the donation of the invitro embryos to a third party. Mr. and Mrs.P realize that once the invitro embryos have been assigned, they can no longer change or withdraw their consents.
1 A copy of the Act (PDF version) can be found on the Health Canada web site: http://hc-sc.gc.ca/alt_formats/hpb-dgps/pdf/reprod/C-6_4_RA.pdf
2 Health reporting information is defined in section 3 of the Act as meaning information provided under the Act respecting "the identity, personal characteristics, genetic information and medical history of donors of human reproductive material and in vitro embryos, persons who have undergone assisted reproduction procedures and persons who were conceived by means of those procedures"; and "the custody of donated human reproductive materials and in vitro embryos and the uses that are made of them".
3 For example, if a woman donates her eggs to a couple for use during their IVF treatment, once her eggs have been assigned to the other couple to create an in vitro embryo, she would no longer have a say as to the future use of the in vitro embryo, i.e. should they stay in storage, should they only be used for the couple's reproductive needs, should they be given to research. Such decisions would rest with the couple for whom the in vitro embryos were created and not the original donor.
4 The Processing and Distribution of Semen for Assisted Conception Regulations can be found on the
Justice Canada website: http://laws.justice.gc.ca. More information on these regulations can be found on the Health Canada-Inspectorate website: http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/hpfb-dgpsa/inspectorate/gui_0041_tc_e.html.